Home

[shante smith]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

because as i've stated multiple times

there was way MORE said than the one post fro dug up



so yea, what else bbys

where are the other posts where u specifically say he's with him for money cuz he left his family, and all this other stuff you're adding on today

i want to see these posts where u specifically use those other things as the "basis" as him being with jefree. just like the one i dug up referencing his looks.

show them to me booba.

[ophmani]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

because as i've stated multiple times

there was way MORE said than the one post fro dug up



so yea, what else bbys

where are the other posts where u specifically say he's with him for money cuz he left his family, and all this other stuff you're adding on today

show them to me booba.

YOU'RE the one who dug into the archives to pull this up

so link the damn thread

[Aalumeci.]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

So the quote was fake?

You made an assumption, yes or no question.

Regardless of what "else" was posted, you assumed you knew the reason he was with Jeffree, even though you hadnt heard anything out of his own mouth. Yes or no?

Yes or no question.

[shante smith]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

because as i've stated multiple times

there was way MORE said than the one post fro dug up



so yea, what else bbys

where are the other posts where u specifically say he's with him for money cuz he left his family, and all this other stuff you're adding on today

show them to me booba.

YOU'RE the one who dug into the archives to pull this up

so link the damn thread

luv im reading the thread now snfnsfnsn

http://www.brandysource.net/index.php?topic=95206.0

i just see you in there constantly referring to jefree as a "thing", and how the guy left his family to be with that "thing"

the FIRST time u mention money in that thread is when ur referencing jefree's looks, and comparing his looks to the looks of the guy's exes.

ya know....making an assumption that he's just with jefree for a quick coin.

[Aalumeci.]

nnnnn not him basing his assumption on the ex-girlfriend's assumption, and thinking that makes it a fact that money was the motive. If it aint from the source its speculation. "why you leave me? money? I can work harder ... come back!

He could have actually liked Jeffree, for your info AND hers

[shante smith]

nnnnn not him basing his assumption on the ex-girlfriend's assumption, and thinking that makes it a fact that money was the motive. If it aint from the source its speculation. "why you leave me? money? I can work harder ... come back!

He could have actually liked Jeffree, for your info AND hers

did he hear the man say he only wanted money in an interview or something?

all this projection! speculation! i cant take eht!

[ton]

oph is being mutilated in hea 

jesus

[DopeSoul.]

[ophmani]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

because as i've stated multiple times

there was way MORE said than the one post fro dug up



so yea, what else bbys

where are the other posts where u specifically say he's with him for money cuz he left his family, and all this other stuff you're adding on today

show them to me booba.

YOU'RE the one who dug into the archives to pull this up

so link the damn thread

luv im reading the thread now snfnsfnsn

http://www.brandysource.net/index.php?topic=95206.0

i just see you in there constantly referring to jefree as a "thing", and how the guy left his family to be with that "thing"

the FIRST time u mention money in that thread is when ur referencing jefree's looks, and comparing his looks to the looks of the guy's exes.

ya know....making an assumption that he's just with jefree for a quick coin.

damn so what you're saying is my statement was based on more much more than just a single photo

which is what i said from the START



what else hny bun

[Aalumeci.]

fuityityidt

[Aalumeci.]

yes or no

[shante smith]

none of what ANY of us said in that thread was based solely on a damn photo

But you did say the guy was only with Jeffree for money, because of what his exes looked like? Is that an assumption based on optics or no? An assumption at the very least right?

no

because as i've stated multiple times

there was way MORE said than the one post fro dug up



so yea, what else bbys

where are the other posts where u specifically say he's with him for money cuz he left his family, and all this other stuff you're adding on today

show them to me booba.

YOU'RE the one who dug into the archives to pull this up

so link the damn thread

luv im reading the thread now snfnsfnsn

http://www.brandysource.net/index.php?topic=95206.0

i just see you in there constantly referring to jefree as a "thing", and how the guy left his family to be with that "thing"

the FIRST time u mention money in that thread is when ur referencing jefree's looks, and comparing his looks to the looks of the guy's exes.

ya know....making an assumption that he's just with jefree for a quick coin.

damn so what you're saying is my statement was based on more much more than just a single photo

which is what i said from the START



what else hny bun

we have more history and info on eve than a single photo 

hun give it up and cut the crap

[ophmani]

yet none of it has been referenced in here as basis for the statement that was made

[shante smith]

yet none of it has been referenced in here as basis for the statement that was made

u didnt reference anything other than jefree's looks when u said that guy was after money

sfsffsfsfsfs



no matter how u spin this luv, u did the same thing Lonz did

which is assume someone's with another person because they want a coin. without knowing the facts for sure.

is that hard to understand? 

[Aalumeci.]

Yes or no