:usuresis:
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1600807283201564672
" i was so ashamed 😩 "
cut the crap.
u dont wear something like that and then cry about it the next day after thinking about it.
as if there wasn't plenty of time to think about it AS you were buying it (or having it custom designed) and AS you were putting it on.
as if you didn't know EXACTLY what that symbol stands for and what message it sends out loud and clear
the "royal" family is the most overrated thing i've seen in my entire life
hmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol. It just released on Thursday. Hence it being a topic again.
The first three episodes were about institutional racism, and Harry's own racism that he had to unlearn to become anti racist. As well as Meghan's admission of ignorance.
I doubt that twitter account even watched.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or events and pics that were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've
acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the
"they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
And this wouldn't be the first time he's acknowledged it. Again, old news.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The same colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
I never assumed you thought the term "leaking" was in regards to new info. That was your assumption of how you thought I used it. lol.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
anyone reading this post knows the correct answer so i'll just see if u answer honestly and straightforwardly. lol
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to
you.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
At the end of the day, this information was clearly new to you. It's not my fault you're posting decades old tea.
:usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use rather than colloquialism intended. That's on you. And then spun it to make it seem like I was suggesting it was "new tea" to the public, when in reality you didn't even know that
1. This old news resurfaced from a docu series. 2. You didn't know of Harry's racist past or the series until today. 3. What a colloquialism is.
There's no mis-intepretation of pulling because the "pulling" was the result from the docu series that aired two days ago. Hence's the picture of Harry in the sit down.
Just admit that you learned something NEW today.
:uhh:
are you ok?
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
i hope that makes sense.
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction and hyper focus of my word usage, just to spin a point. Zooming in on the use of "technically" to spin it into some semantic. Just enjoy your slow news day.
"if you're truly getting technical..."
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
QuoteThe same colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
Probably missed it. Like you missed this old news when it came out 18 years ago.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:30:38 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
yet you fail to acknowledge your wrong in trying to finely define what it is to "pull" something - correcting me on usage as if there's only one way to use the word when there is in fact multiple ways.
sendin u hugs boo <3
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:34:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:30:38 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
yet you fail to acknowledge your wrong in trying to finely define what it is to "pull" something - correcting me on usage as if there's only one way to use the word when there is in fact multiple ways.
sendin u hugs boo <3
I didn't define pull. I presented a dichotomy of informal phrases after you challenged my use of the word leak. Ppl use leak in informal ways and still, I corrected myself with my
technicality idc how you use pulling nor did I assume you were using it in any way.
Hope that helps.
You're bothered because the tea you claim was being pulled was decades old news, and you didn't know about it until TODAY.
Your ego shouldn't be getting bruised over this. :plzstop:
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:38:00 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:34:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:30:38 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
yet you fail to acknowledge your wrong in trying to finely define what it is to "pull" something - correcting me on usage as if there's only one way to use the word when there is in fact multiple ways.
sendin u hugs boo <3
I didn't define pull. I presented a dichotomy of informal phrases after you challenged my use of the word leak. Ppl use leak in multiple ways and I corrected myself with my technicality
You're bothered because the tea you claim was being pulled was decades old news, and you didn't know about it until TODAY.
Your ego shouldn't be getting bruised over this. :plzstop:
ummm i think it's clear the articles were dated - one of them literally say 2009
sffssfsf
i said that on page 1 of our discussion. did u miss it?
what's clearly happening here is twitter doing its work of "pulling" receipts from the past in effort to hold people accountable in the present. the "this you?" routine. that's what i was speaking to and i thought that was pretty obvious. but it appears i have to spell it out
when did i say all this stuff was brand new information?
the problem here is that you're reading way too much into this
referencing my "ego" and maybe looking a lil deeper than u need to.
i didn't think any of this was brand new information nor did i present it as such. does that clear things up for u?
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:42:39 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:38:00 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:34:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:30:38 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
yet you fail to acknowledge your wrong in trying to finely define what it is to "pull" something - correcting me on usage as if there's only one way to use the word when there is in fact multiple ways.
sendin u hugs boo <3
I didn't define pull. I presented a dichotomy of informal phrases after you challenged my use of the word leak. Ppl use leak in multiple ways and I corrected myself with my technicality
You're bothered because the tea you claim was being pulled was decades old news, and you didn't know about it until TODAY.
Your ego shouldn't be getting bruised over this. :plzstop:
ummm i think it's clear the articles were dated - one of them literally say 2009
sffssfsf
i said that on page 1 of our discussion. did u miss it?
what's clearly happening here is twitter doing its work of "pulling" receipts from the past in effort to hold people accountable in the present. the "this you?" routine. that's what i was speaking to and i thought that was pretty obvious. but it appears i have to spell it out
when did i say all this stuff was brand new information?
the problem here is that you're reading way too much into this
referencing my "ego" and maybe looking a lil deeper than u need to.
It's brand new information, TO YOU.
Something from 2009 can still be new info for you personally, if you didn't know it existed until today.
It's evident this info is new, to
you. Because otherwise you would know the context which sparked the conversation on twitter.
Twitter is pulling receipts
after the docu series aired, but is failing to add any context to the discussion by actually having watched the docu series and know that Harry and Meghan held themselves accountable.
A platform which has a character limit per message is a silly platform it seriously hold anyone, TRULY, accountable. But go on, hun. Clearly you have a point you have to make, that you feel you haven't already two pages in. You're invested.
i mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:47:43 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:42:39 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:38:00 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:34:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:30:38 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:28:21 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:26:07 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:19:50 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:17:59 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:12:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:09:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:07:43 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:05:41 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:00:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:56:56 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:54:04 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:51:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:49:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:48:05 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:42:00 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:40:15 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 06:37:59 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 06:31:57 AMhmmm...
he wore this like 20 years ago or so...he was a reckless ignorant kid. He went into his humanitarian efforts right after this, living in Botswana for a while and stepped outside of his bubble.
nice that he went to africa for a lil while
but unfortunately they're pulling more tea
https://twitter.com/TheWantonWench/status/1595803233481818114
This is tea they leaked themselves in their docu series on Netflix lol..
i don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
do u mean they've acknowledged their wrongdoing? and chose not to ignore the receipts that are already out there?
cuz that's different from willingly sharing incriminating pics/tea that is hidden. lol....
Let me reiterate, technically the "they're pulling more tea" you posted isn't really anything being "pulled" because it's already been talked about for years and most recently in their doc series where they themselves brought it back up, to yes, acknowledge it.
if you're truly getting technical you should probably realize that "pulling" could mean many different things and does not automatically and/or solely mean "introducing".
The came colloquialism can be used for "leak", beloved. ;-)
well if that's your personal interpretation of "pulling" just say that.
that's understandable.
i never implied that a user on twitter was "leaking" brand new information - which i think should be obvious considering they clearly shared dated articles - including one which is clearly dated 2009.
sffssfsffs make sense?
It's not, but it was your interpretation and assumption for my use of "leak" evidently.
Quotei don't think they can "leak" statements that were made in public and/or were already documented and reported on.
well you're the one who wanted to get "technical" so here we are. lol :shannonsmissing:
so ..in the spirit of getting technical..
u used the word "leak" ... what does that usually mean... to say when someone "leaked" something ...in regards to media/entertainment/news?
does it mean to share info the public already has access to?
or to introduce new information?
Well back to square one, you used the term "tea". In most colloquialisms, tea can be applied in the same technicalities you're applying to leaked.
It truly doesn't matter because clearly this old news was new info to you.
not so fast, as there is such a thing as "old tea" and "new tea".
there are different types of "tea" but there is only one kind of "leak".
nice try though.
I didn't assume either because you didn't specify. :usuresis:
Arguing about colloquialisms is silly when You're the one who took Umbridge to my use of "leak". So really any technicalities started with you.
reminder: you're the one who sent the invite to explore technicalities of the words we're using. don't deem the conversation silly now because u ended up kinda losing ur footing in the process.
bottom line:
ultimately i didn't misinterpret "leak" as you're suggesting
there's literally no way to misinterpret that as there is only one known meaning to the word in relation to media/news.
if anything , your misinterpretation of "pulling" something is what led us down this rabbit hole of technicalities - a rabbit hole that YOU led us to.
but this was cute
You assumed I used leak in a literary use
you can't say "lets get technical here" and then say "why are you being so technical" in the next breath
if ur not ready or willing to go there then just leave a tea as it is.
sffssfsfsf
You were the one to question why we were getting technical, and initially alluded to it with your over-correction of my word usage, just to spin a point.
Lol but ok girl.
I'll leave the new info you previously weren't privy to as is.
and you're the one who tried to school me on the technical definition of "pulling" something as if there's one solid and uniform meaning for the word in relation to news/media...u know...kinda like there is for a "leak".
lol but ok honey bun!
I already stated this, Baloo.
yet you fail to acknowledge your wrong in trying to finely define what it is to "pull" something - correcting me on usage as if there's only one way to use the word when there is in fact multiple ways.
sendin u hugs boo <3
I didn't define pull. I presented a dichotomy of informal phrases after you challenged my use of the word leak. Ppl use leak in multiple ways and I corrected myself with my technicality
You're bothered because the tea you claim was being pulled was decades old news, and you didn't know about it until TODAY.
Your ego shouldn't be getting bruised over this. :plzstop:
ummm i think it's clear the articles were dated - one of them literally say 2009
sffssfsf
i said that on page 1 of our discussion. did u miss it?
what's clearly happening here is twitter doing its work of "pulling" receipts from the past in effort to hold people accountable in the present. the "this you?" routine. that's what i was speaking to and i thought that was pretty obvious. but it appears i have to spell it out
when did i say all this stuff was brand new information?
the problem here is that you're reading way too much into this
referencing my "ego" and maybe looking a lil deeper than u need to.
It's brand new information, TO YOU.
Something from 2009 can still be new info for you personally, if you didn't know it existed until today.
It's evident this info is new, to you. Because otherwise you would know the context which sparked the conversation on twitter.
Twitter is pulling receipts after the docu series aired, but is failing to add any context to the discussion by actually having watched the docu series and know that Harry and Meghan held themselves accountable.
A platform which has a character limit per message is a silly platform it seriously hold anyone, TRULY, accountable. But go on, hun. Clearly you have a point you have to make, that you feel you haven't already two pages in. You're invested.
well yeah it is new information for me.
i've said before that i don't keep up with the "royal" family
am i supposed to be upset i didn't know this stuff already? is that why my "ego is bruised"?
im sorry but i dont know what ur getting at here.
like what's the problem?
sfsfsffssffssf
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information
you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
like im seriously confused
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
That you were initially confused and thought I meant something other than what I clearly stated.
you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
So damn contrary. it's giving npd.
.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
i have no problem saying that.
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" and referencing the date as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Quotei mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
You didn't understand. I clarified.
Hope this helps.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:09:45 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Hope this helps.
i was never under the impression that you thought any of this was "new released tea"
if anything it was clear to me from the jump that this was all "old news" for you.
that was ur argument. no?
im sorry but what ur saying isn't making sense to me.
there's clearly a misunderstanding here
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:13:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:09:45 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Hope this helps.
i was never under the impression that you thought any of this was "new released tea"
if anything it was clear to me from the jump that this was all "old news" for you.
im sorry but what ur saying isn't making sense to me.
It's evident you assumed
I was presumptuously stating
you thought it was new info, as in newly released. I was clarifying that it was old news, but new info to you. The only significance, is that you were confused, so I reiterated, countlessly.
Quit the shit.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:18:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:13:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:09:45 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Hope this helps.
i was never under the impression that you thought any of this was "new released tea"
if anything it was clear to me from the jump that this was all "old news" for you.
im sorry but what ur saying isn't making sense to me.
It's evident you assumed I was presumptuously stating you thought it was new info, as in newly released.
Quit the shit.
there's clearly one or a few misunderstandings here and i'd say it's either on one or both of our parts.
so it's probably best we end it here cuz we'll be going in circles forever at this point and it'll just be endlessly frustrating.
sdfsfssssf
but it was honestly nice chattin with u a bit luv
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:21:17 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:18:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:13:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:09:45 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Hope this helps.
i was never under the impression that you thought any of this was "new released tea"
if anything it was clear to me from the jump that this was all "old news" for you.
im sorry but what ur saying isn't making sense to me.
It's evident you assumed I was presumptuously stating you thought it was new info, as in newly released.
Quit the shit.
there's clearly one or a few misunderstandings here and i'd say it's either on one or both of our parts.
so it's probably best we end it here cuz we'll be going in circles forever at this point and it'll just be endlessly frustrating.
sdfsfssssf
but it was honestly nice chattin with u a bit luv
same luv.
Quote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:22:11 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:21:17 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:18:46 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:13:56 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 08:09:45 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 08:06:52 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:57:23 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:53:19 AMQuote from: NEW MOON on December 10, 2022, 07:52:20 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 07:49:11 AMi mean the tweet i chose to share in the OP literally has a dated/old tabloid cover with the photo on it.
sfsfsf :shannonsmissing:
how could i assume this was brand new information?
@NEW MOON
im sorry but what ur saying just doesn't make sense.
Lord have mercy..
Clearly this is information you previously didn't know existed until you read it.
Not, information that is just coming out.
What's not clicking? :uhh:
ok yeah
but what does that mean? what is the significance in that?
sfsfsfsfsffs
hun i think ur looking too deep into this.
No hun, you're just being contrived and needing me to "spell it out for you"
and then when I do, gaslight by "you're looking to deep into this".
Instead of just admitting you had a lapse in judgement or quite frankly, not responding.
I'm telling you to enjoy this information you stumbled upon so you can be content with your "accountability" pursuit.
I assume I triggered such a hostile response from you somewhere along the way.
im just confused cuz for me ur stating the obvious
"brand new information TO YOU!"
well yeah it is.
if u knew about this, like millions of others of people who saw the tabloids and magazines and newspapers that publicized these events/pics/statements...i mean that's great. awesome.
if ur issue was me not admitting that it's "new information for YOU!"...i mean let me just say that explicitly. it's new to me
sfsfsfsffssf
are we good now?
Clearly it's not obvious because you initially kept stating "2009" as If I was suggesting this was new released tea. Hence, the emphasis in making you sure you understood its new "to you".
Hope this helps.
i was never under the impression that you thought any of this was "new released tea"
if anything it was clear to me from the jump that this was all "old news" for you.
im sorry but what ur saying isn't making sense to me.
It's evident you assumed I was presumptuously stating you thought it was new info, as in newly released.
Quit the shit.
there's clearly one or a few misunderstandings here and i'd say it's either on one or both of our parts.
so it's probably best we end it here cuz we'll be going in circles forever at this point and it'll just be endlessly frustrating.
sdfsfssssf
but it was honestly nice chattin with u a bit luv
same luv.
:sistas:
There's something very genuine about Harry so I think he really was just young and stupid at the time plus times were different. A Nazi costume was edgy back then but it wasn't like today where it's completely out of line.
And I see there was a lot of quoting going on. Should I anticipate more mess or have y'all resolved? Lmk
All these curly strands everywhere...my god :uhh:
Y'all okay in here? :plzstop: and if Harry was a true Nazi, no way he would've consummated with Megan. They don't believe in race mixing. He was just being stupid back then and didn't know any better. He seems like a sweetheart to me.
Who is "NEW MOON"? Its giving old member tea :plzstop:
Quote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:17:23 AMAnd I see there was a lot of quoting going on. Should I anticipate more mess or have y'all resolved? Lmk
It's actually a good entertaining back and forth. I was bored and read it all. About time we get some real action around here it's been boring lately.
someone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol i went to africa and hugged black bvys im better now"
certain things aren't easily phased out
and i just dont see it for the "royal" family at all so im not even considering the possibility of growth.
ssdfsdfdsdsds which could be unfair but it is what tf it is
Quote from: Saint on December 10, 2022, 09:25:34 AMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:17:23 AMAnd I see there was a lot of quoting going on. Should I anticipate more mess or have y'all resolved? Lmk
It's actually a good entertaining back and forth. I was bored and read it all. About time we get some real action around here it's been boring lately.
Excellent. Driving now but I will def be digging in 😈
Quote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
Quote from: JCJ on December 10, 2022, 09:21:02 AMAll these curly strands everywhere...my god :uhh:
New Moon kinda lashed :nogrammynoneck:
Quote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:33:35 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
i honestly don't keep up with or care for the "royals" at all, so im biased right owt the gate with this all
sdsdssdss
ill just say im not surprised to see him in this costume
the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
maybe he's had to do a lot of unlearning and if he's put int he work great for him
i just dont care enough about him or his family enough to see past the costume and even try to understand him.
i did it for kanye and def did it for kyrie as he was truly misunderstood, and i did it for azealia during her anti-black era
but its just not in me right now to extend that grace to the "prince" even if he has indeed changed or grown , etc.
i just dont like them and feel that they are severely overrated.
and i can admit that.
what TRUE royalty looks like
problematic flaws and all :blush: :blush:
(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/hoivfrk2j7ceomvgpeja.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2JbSPiWwAEIMW3?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1FwOYI2kay4/maxresdefault.jpg)
Megan ain't black.
Just wanted to bring that up.
Quote from: Nine on December 10, 2022, 10:16:09 AMMegan ain't black.
Just wanted to bring that up.
i was gonna say poeple using her as some sort of proof that hes grown
when shes a woman who says herself that she was never "treated as a black woman" until she entered the palace
her own words.
shes mixed, people see her as mixed and many even see her as White passing.
it's not quite the same optics of harry marrying a halle berry or someone who looks like Latto....
how she ultimately identifies is totally up to her but shes clearly said she cant relate to the experience of a black woman flat out.
but naturally, without the ironed hair and whatever she did to her mug
Meghan def looked like what she is. a mixed/black girl. who could possibly be mistaken for Latina. she reminds me of cardi a lil in this specific pic.
but she def looks "of color" in her natural state
(https://i.ibb.co/hVYM4Kb/bc24eda7b4acc1652eb08dcbf682059c-2.jpg)
Afro, for you to not care about the Royals, you have put a lot of effort into this thread.
Quote from: BetterAngels on December 10, 2022, 11:20:00 AMAfro, for you to not care about the Royals, you have put a lot of effort into this thread.
we were arguing definitions and technicalities of words
Just like me replying to ur feedback now has nothing to do with the "royals" themselves but ur opinion of how I handled the thread
You would have made a great point if all 3 pages were full of me giving details on how much I know about the "royals" instead of saying this apparently well known info is new to me .
There's a difference .
Does that make sense?
DISCLAIMER: This thorough reply to you does not mean I'm even more invested in the "royals".
He was a kid then and people can change.
If he was grown and doing it then that would be different.
The fact he did this when he was younger shows the kind of environment he grew up in and choose to leave.
We are a product of our environment and it takes guts to admit what you have done wrong in the past and choose to better yourself and leave behind a toxic family and environment.
Quote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 10:04:39 AMwhat TRUE royalty looks like
problematic flaws and all :blush: :blush:
(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/hoivfrk2j7ceomvgpeja.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2JbSPiWwAEIMW3?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1FwOYI2kay4/maxresdefault.jpg)
2 of those don't belong lol
Quote from: Buy The Stars✨ on December 10, 2022, 12:49:38 PMQuote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 10:04:39 AMwhat TRUE royalty looks like
problematic flaws and all :blush: :blush:
(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/hoivfrk2j7ceomvgpeja.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2JbSPiWwAEIMW3?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1FwOYI2kay4/maxresdefault.jpg)
2 of those don't belong lol
:ummwhat:
Quote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 09:49:14 AMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:33:35 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
i honestly don't keep up with or care
im biased
im not surprised
the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
i just dont care enough about him or his family enough
i just dont like them
:unsure:
Quote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 12:59:24 PMQuote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 09:49:14 AMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:33:35 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
i honestly don't keep up with or care
im biased
im not surprised
the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
i just dont care enough about him or his family enough
i just dont like them
:unsure:
did i mention that i dont use?
ssfsfsffs
Quote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 01:00:25 PMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 12:59:24 PMQuote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 09:49:14 AMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:33:35 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
i honestly don't keep up with or care
im biased
im not surprised
the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
i just dont care enough about him or his family enough
i just dont like them
:unsure:
did i mention that i dont use?
ssfsfsffs
NCNCNFFFNHFNFFFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFH
I don't think so but thank you for clarifying. Was a little foggy.
Quote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 01:01:47 PMQuote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 01:00:25 PMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 12:59:24 PMQuote from: tyler nipsey kyrie on December 10, 2022, 09:49:14 AMQuote from: Big Barbie on December 10, 2022, 09:33:35 AMQuote from: 🎁 from Brazil on December 10, 2022, 09:30:11 AMsomeone doesn't have to be 100% in alignment with beliefs and practices of one group in order to be comfortable and in agreeance with their overall idea of supremacy
and there are plenty of white people who will say "im not racist" and point u in the direction of their black/mixed best friend or lover , or even their child as proof .
but i will say he was younger and for that i can see why some will extend grace
....however, there are certain things that can be so deeply rooted that it would be hard for me to believe someone saying "oh yeah i wore a ku klux klan outfit when i was 20 but im past that phase of my life . lol"
certain things aren't easily phased out
I agree that it takes more than someone simply stating over-and-over that they've changed. I think Harry has SHOWED his change and not by just marrying Meghan, hbu?
i honestly don't keep up with or care
im biased
im not surprised
the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
i just dont care enough about him or his family enough
i just dont like them
:unsure:
did i mention that i dont use?
ssfsfsffs
NCNCNFFFNHFNFFFHFHFHFHFHFHFHFH
I don't think so but thank you for clarifying. Was a little foggy.
:justabit:
Cleanup on aisle 1,2,3,4, and 5
vccxx
Quote from: L0nz. on December 10, 2022, 01:56:30 PMCleanup on aisle 1,2,3,4, and 5
Bbbbbfghhjjjjjksssssssssss
@Black Jew https://twitter.com/people/status/1603452844786565128
Quote from: Big Barbie on December 15, 2022, 10:49:02 PM@Black Jew
https://twitter.com/people/status/1603452844786565128
true royalty has finally entered that family it seems :raycharles2urmess: