Brandy Source

Lounge => General Discussion => Topic started by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 01:31:34 AM

Title: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 01:31:34 AM
QuoteBarring a super-duper breakout performance in South Korea (April 20), China (May 12) and Japan (July 15), Power Rangers is not going to be a mega-hit that was hoped for after its big $40.3 million domestic opening weekend. That makes the notion of a sequel the very definition of a risky bet. While there is always a chance that a Power Rangers 2 could break out thanks to those who liked the first film and discovered it after theaters, it doesn?t seem terribly likely. As such, barring a massive overseas gross, Power Rangers may be a one-and-done deal.

The film, which stars Dacre Montgomery, Naomi Scott, RJ Cyler, Ludi Lin, Becky G., Elizabeth Banks, Bryan Cranston and Bill Hader, fell 64% in weekend two and 56% in weekend three for a $75m 17-day total. The film will likely make around $90m in North America, for an over/under 2.25x multiplier. That?s not good, as even the likes of X-Men (which was frontloaded in its day) earned $157m from a $54m debut weekend, or a 2.9x multiplier. And it hasn?t gone nuts overseas either, with just $117m worldwide thus far with much of the world played out.
read more at Forbes
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2017/04/11/box-office-why-a-power-rangers-sequel-would-be-a-risky-bet/amp/

(http://i.imgur.com/Z90cTYq.jpg)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 01:32:16 AM
Zankou?
Code red right hea
(http://i.imgur.com/Z90cTYq.jpg)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: GRAND on April 17, 2017, 01:41:03 AM
Fags I said it wouldn't touch 150
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 01:47:00 AM
Quote from: LORD GRAND SUPREME MARSHALL on April 17, 2017, 01:41:03 AM
Fags I said it wouldn't touch 150
king :flamebroiled: was just about to pm you the mess

Not it stalling at $90 mill domestically
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: GRAND on April 17, 2017, 01:48:11 AM
Cxxxccc ccccvvv

It ain't getting a sequel btw genesis cartier and bran
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 01:52:55 AM
Vvvvvvvxvcccfccccccccc

Yea
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: BAPHOMET. on April 17, 2017, 02:11:37 AM
 :letsmessfag:

The way Zank' and Cartier were carrying on.
Get the fuck in hea  :blessed:
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: MelMel on April 17, 2017, 02:16:39 AM
dsdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: b7 on April 17, 2017, 02:17:35 AM
Ghhhhhhhhhg
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: b7 on April 17, 2017, 02:17:48 AM
Code red right hea
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Opposites Attract. on April 17, 2017, 02:33:40 AM
I actually think they rushed through a lot of shit. The way they are linked up was rushed. It went from training to getting killed to big fight to the end. I think they should do the sequel or do a Netflix series.
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 02:35:09 AM
q

great insight marg
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: XXX. on April 17, 2017, 03:18:35 AM
Quote from: DAMN. on April 17, 2017, 02:41:20 AM
n

dddddddddfffffffffssssssssssssssssssss
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: BigDawg on April 17, 2017, 03:20:46 AM
N

not Forbes
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Cartierline on April 17, 2017, 06:05:23 AM
b

Not surprised tbh. It kinda sucked.

Not even sure I want to see a sequel.
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Gilgamesh. on April 17, 2017, 06:38:22 AM
They should have left this alone.
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: BAPHOMET. on April 17, 2017, 09:38:44 AM
Quote from: Cartier on April 17, 2017, 06:05:23 AM
b

Not surprised tbh. It kinda sucked.

Not even sure I want to see a sequel.

whew!

(http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g225/Jonovan2006/Oprah.gif)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: wizzy on April 17, 2017, 09:57:37 AM
c
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 10:10:56 AM
zank?
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 17, 2017, 10:11:40 AM
He sure was rockin that Power Rang' blade mess in his sig all proud and loud before the numbers dropped
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 25, 2017, 10:32:59 PM
Bump
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: BAPHOMET. on April 25, 2017, 10:33:39 PM
Gggfffdddff
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Rxxf on April 25, 2017, 10:34:48 PM
Quote from: LORD GRAND SUPREME MARSHALL on April 17, 2017, 01:41:03 AM
Fags I said it wouldn't touch 150

You were right
I stand corrected
It did better than most expected though

$133.1 million overall is not bad
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 25, 2017, 10:42:20 PM
!!

it's terrible
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: GRAND on April 25, 2017, 10:44:34 PM
Quote from: SingBran on April 25, 2017, 10:34:48 PM
Quote from: LORD GRAND SUPREME MARSHALL on April 17, 2017, 01:41:03 AM
Fags I said it wouldn't touch 150

You were right
I stand corrected
It did better than most expected though

$133.1 million overall is not bad
it was made on a 100 dollar budget

That's horrific

(http://i.imgur.com/HpPGvhE.png)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: BAPHOMET. on April 25, 2017, 10:44:43 PM
 :omgwatshappening: @ it's budget being $105 million


Anyway. Just read an article and the original cast HATED this movie.   :dead:
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 25, 2017, 10:49:05 PM
:kii:
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: b7 on April 25, 2017, 10:54:34 PM
Quote from: Baph al Mana. on April 25, 2017, 10:44:43 PM
:omgwatshappening: @ it's budget being $105 million


Anyway. Just read an article and the original cast HATED this movie.   :dead:
sdsdsdsdsds what'd they say?

i hope they weren't criticizing some damn ACTING because
:udontlookok:
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 27, 2017, 01:39:09 PM
muhfckin BUMP
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: GRAND on April 27, 2017, 01:56:03 PM
Brandon

(http://i.imgur.com/mm0Bf5B.gif)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Young on April 27, 2017, 01:57:35 PM
Sndbdbdbdbdbfbfbfbbfbffbfbfbf I knew why this was bumped
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on April 27, 2017, 02:20:56 PM
Quote from: LORD GRAND SUPREME MARSHALL on April 27, 2017, 01:56:03 PM
Brandon

(http://i.imgur.com/mm0Bf5B.gif)
cccccccccc
(http://i.imgur.com/mm0Bf5B.gif)
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: fedswatchin on May 01, 2017, 03:23:25 PM
Damn
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: Eternal Bell on May 01, 2017, 03:49:15 PM
yyyyyyyyyyyyyy4ebgdvf
Title: Re: Forbes: Why A 'Power Rangers' Sequel Would Be A Risky Bet
Post by: GRAND on May 01, 2017, 03:49:34 PM
Vvvvvcccvvvvv