Quote
The guy going down on Cardi B on her mixtape cover is pissed off because he claims he never posed for the photo, and never signed off on his image being used in such a sexual manner.
Cardi's "Gangsta Bitch Music Vol. 1" cover shows a shirtless guy, with very distinct back ink, performing oral sex on the rapper. Kevin Brophy says the image is 100% him, but he only found out about it when a friend said how crazy is it that you're "cunnilinging [sic] this rapper called Cardi B."
According to the docs, obtained by TMZ, the artwork made for a seriously awkward moment when Brophy's pre-K son asked what Daddy was doing in the picture, and who's that girl? Brophy says his son keeps bringing it up, too.
In the docs, Brophy says he's never met Cardi or spoken to her or her people -- but he knows that's his distinct back art of a tiger battling a snake ... which he's had for 10 years.
He obviously knows who the "Bodak Yellow" rapper is now. Brophy's making a money move of his own ... suing Cardi and her managers for at least $5 million.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNJ4tFfU8AAkqnh?format=jpg)
you cant even see his face.
The girls will really try anything to get a check.
Oh no.
If they really did just use some random guy's pic, they're going to have to pay him something.
But this has me screaming...
QuoteAccording to the docs, obtained by TMZ, the artwork made for a seriously awkward moment when Brophy's pre-K son asked what Daddy was doing in the picture, and who's that girl? Brophy says his son keeps bringing it up, too.
:kii:
Boy, please. Don't lay it on too thick.
Quote from: BardiGang Sle on October 27, 2017, 04:11:36 PM
you cant even see his face.
The girls will really try anything to get a check.
tatoos are very distinguishing as well though.
he could have a case.
HE doesn?t have anything. Pics uploaded to the internet are not copy written.
This whole thing is a joke.
Wow. She's officially made it, huh
I saw this yesterday and I don?t get it
Did they photoshop his pic between her legs?
It looks like he?s really there with her
[instagram]https://www.instagram.com/p/BavHZMWFvXR/?hl=en[/instagram]
Quote
the6atsixWhoever this fuckin bum ass "Kevin Brophy" is needs to find another way to finesse food for his kids. Fuckin lame ass nigga. @iamcardib iunno if this shit is real but it's all over the fuckin internet right now. Tag Cardi, tag TMZ, tag Worldstar. This nigga a FRAUD n I'm not sue'n cardi for shit. Lesson learned??? DONT TRY TO SUE PEOPLE WHEN YOU DONT KNOW WA GWAN! #NiggaTriedToFinesse #HeFailed @tmz_tv @worldstar @theshaderoom @balleralert #CardiB
That guy is lying. He's the real person.
Quote from: Lazarus on October 27, 2017, 04:26:55 PM
[instagram]https://www.instagram.com/p/BavHZMWFvXR/?hl=en[/instagram]
Quote
the6atsixWhoever this fuckin bum ass "Kevin Brophy" is needs to find another way to finesse food for his kids. Fuckin lame ass nigga. @iamcardib iunno if this shit is real but it's all over the fuckin internet right now. Tag Cardi, tag TMZ, tag Worldstar. This nigga a FRAUD n I'm not sue'n cardi for shit. Lesson learned??? DONT TRY TO SUE PEOPLE WHEN YOU DONT KNOW WA GWAN! #NiggaTriedToFinesse #HeFailed @tmz_tv @worldstar @theshaderoom @balleralert #CardiB
That guy is lying. He's the real person.
Death. Yeah. Kwee wins again.
BBhhgvbhh
Ok it didn?t make any sense, like clearly he was there and did the pose with her
why would he be suing over how sexual it looks?
He?s kinda hot. Let me ask if he needs a date to court.
I don't think he's denying his presence at the shoot - he's saying that he never agreed to that pose in particular and didn't give consent for her to use his image commercially.
She should have had him to sign something explaining the clear purpose of her intent with the image - chances are he's flat out lying about this all (in regards to his obliviousness) but it could be a case. The image is basically softcore porn :plzstop: He could claim its caused damage to his reputation, emotional distress, and blah blah blah blah.
King is about to get paid it seems.
N Af
Quote from: swirl on October 27, 2017, 04:30:54 PM
I don't think he's denying his presence at the shoot - he's saying that he never agreed to that pose in particular and didn't give consent for her to use his image commercially.
She should have had him to sign something explaining the clear purpose of her intent with the image - chances are he's flat out lying about this all (in regards to his obliviousness) but it could be a case. The image is basically softcore porn :plzstop: He could claim its caused damage to his reputation, emotional distress, and blah blah blah blah.
So you just going to ignore that it?s a whole other nigga in the pic? Wtf
hi80gu
I didn't see that post. :plzstop:
But even though people's appearances don't come with a copyright stamped into their neck, it's still certain rights you have. Which is why people have to sign off before they do TV shows, etc. Theyre using their image and likeness for profit. It would have been a case ..IF it were him.