Home

[ophababes.]

who cares. they made a mistake, big deal.

they did more to correct it than tasha k's lying ass who was sued and LOST for being a big mouth know nothing ass BIRD.

tasha k actually presents herself as a gossip hungry messy gorl

not some "journalist" who's looking for the facts.

so calling her what she owns her brand to be isn't really egg on her face

nice try though

none of this has anything to do with the point i made, but i know you like to make empty excuses for tasha k so go off babe.

saying someone is messy and a proud gossipmonger isn't an "excuse" , it's kinda calling a spade what it is without a deeper explanation or proposed reasoning .

Lemme break it down further for you .  An excuse would sound something like , "she only does it because ... " or "that person did something to her first doe!! That's why she does it!"

But do ur thang gorl . That was awesome

[ophababes.]

As long as they cleared it up afterwards, I don't see the issue.

[CHOKE]

Sksjjdjdjdjdjjdjdjfjfjfjfjfjfjf

[crunk aint dead]

who cares. they made a mistake, big deal.

they did more to correct it than tasha k's lying ass who was sued and LOST for being a big mouth know nothing ass BIRD.

tasha k actually presents herself as a gossip hungry messy gorl

not some "journalist" who's looking for the facts.

so calling her what she owns her brand to be isn't really egg on her face

nice try though

none of this has anything to do with the point i made, but i know you like to make empty excuses for tasha k so go off babe.

saying someone is messy and a proud gossipmonger isn't an "excuse" , it's kinda calling a spade what it is without a deeper explanation or proposed reasoning .

Lemme break it down further for you .  An excuse would sound something like , "she only does it because ... " or "that person did something to her first doe!! That's why she does it!"

But do ur thang gorl . That was awesome

right. excuse wasn't the word you needed to use.
if anything saying i support tasha (especially her blatantly messy antics against consuela) would be 100% correct.

sorry but if someone's telling me what i do or don't do, i gotta make sure it's accurate.

now let's move along.

[ophababes.]

who cares. they made a mistake, big deal.

they did more to correct it than tasha k's lying ass who was sued and LOST for being a big mouth know nothing ass BIRD.

tasha k actually presents herself as a gossip hungry messy gorl

not some "journalist" who's looking for the facts.

so calling her what she owns her brand to be isn't really egg on her face

nice try though

none of this has anything to do with the point i made, but i know you like to make empty excuses for tasha k so go off babe.

saying someone is messy and a proud gossipmonger isn't an "excuse" , it's kinda calling a spade what it is without a deeper explanation or proposed reasoning .

Lemme break it down further for you .  An excuse would sound something like , "she only does it because ... " or "that person did something to her first doe!! That's why she does it!"

But do ur thang gorl . That was awesome

right. excuse wasn't the word you needed to use.
if anything saying i support tasha (especially her blatantly messy antics against consuela) would be 100% correct.

sorry but if someone's telling me what i do or don't do, i gotta make sure it's accurate.

now let's move along.

girl get a life and leave me alone about this 

[crunk aint dead]

im done luv. u can leave

[ophababes.]

im done

[crunk aint dead]

that was pretty clear when i said let's move along

but you've now quoted me twice since then.

gonna be hard for me to honor this whole "leave me alone" request if that keeps happening. just a heads up

[Kalifornia.]

Michelle is so bitter

[ophababes.]

Michelle is so bitter

[b7]

omg i was wondering what they were apologizing for the other day
 

[b7]

Ain't no "clearing it up", unfortunately. Their disparaging words were a lot louder and more entertaining than the truth, so, now many people will be running with that. Super gross on Claudia/Al's part

[crunk aint dead]

Ain't no "clearing it up", unfortunately. Their disparaging words were a lot louder and more entertaining than the truth, so, now many people will be running with that. Super gross on Claudia/Al's part

right

You can clear up misinformation but when you've adlibbed a bunch of "that's what her lil daughter gets for having her as a mom lmao " and "she's pure trash" in addition to spreading the misinformation ....

Their apologies clearly aren't enough for her and I see why .

People make mistakes and get their facts wrong but to even slightly imply her daughter had this coming to her cuz of her mother ...... they did a bit too much with the wrong info.

[crunk aint dead]

And it's one thing to call someone anti-black who is just a regular degular person who may or may not feel deeply about black issues

But to make that accusation against someone who spends their life fighting for black causes and people ...

That had to really hurt her . Like seriously . To even have that put out there . There's no guarantee that everyone who received/saw the misinformation saw the retraction.

It's a little different than someone getting hit with a legal technicality because the person they called a prostitute/escort , who actually put information out saying they brought men home from strip clubs with intention to have sex and drugged them, didn't actually use the word "prostitution" or "escorting" to describe their activity .

Al just needs to never do "research" again. Hire someone . Hell I think an intern could have done a better job

[Kalifornia.]

Yeah, retractions do little to nothing once the mess is already out there.

I commend them for trying to fix things but the damage is already done.

Hopefully they learn from this.