US Vogue just doesn’t compare, huh?

Started by b7, August 30, 2019, 08:49:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Naomi Hit Me


Opposites Attract.

Quote from: 1RIG on August 31, 2019, 07:57:29 AM
This thread is about the difference in quality, not questioning why Taylor is on the cover

the pose, look and everything looks cheap as fuck
dssssss

I just....


It's unconditional, these days you know....

Opposites Attract.

Quote from: GODlli's bitch 🔥 on August 31, 2019, 08:36:43 AM

Very plain Jane, pretty and simple girl next door.

The VOGUE cover is in line with that. She's not here for high fashion teas this era.



Vogue is high fashion sis. This cover is disgusting


It's unconditional, these days you know....

Jon


BAPHOMET.

Quote from: g u i d a n c e on August 31, 2019, 08:46:33 AM
Yeah. Was your turn to be WRONG in here, fag.
Now keep it moving. Didn't ask for your input.
wtf


Boomz


LOONA.

Anna lost her touch years ago. Other than keeping up appearances she shouldn't be sticking around.   

'ology

August 31, 2019, 02:49:54 PM #37 Last Edit: August 31, 2019, 02:52:38 PM by 'ology
Quote from: g u i d a n c e on August 31, 2019, 08:15:52 AM
Quote from: 'ology on August 31, 2019, 08:14:14 AM
Quote from: GODlli's bitch 🔥 on August 31, 2019, 07:58:58 AM
Quote from: 1RIG on August 31, 2019, 07:57:29 AM
This thread is about the difference in quality, not questioning why Taylor is on the cover

oh.

Thank God. I thought it was another woke mess out.   :shook:
Z
Pay attention
Like you do to my posts, faggot?
Somebody has to do it! I figured I'd bite the bullet 🤷🏽‍♂️
Blessed Be The Mufuckin Fruit!!!


'ology

Blessed Be The Mufuckin Fruit!!!