"Holding the Man" was yet another gay aids movie mess

Started by BAPHOMET., January 30, 2016, 08:49:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sinpool



death

Quote from: SUPREME on January 30, 2016, 10:42:37 PM
sssssddsss


When I became an adult I had an obsession with gay film

You can find a bunch of movies without aids and back alley sex

You just have to look hard. And it won't be the relevant ones.
!!!

death


death


yekim

Quote from: SUPREME on January 30, 2016, 11:00:42 PM
I haven't watched anything in years but "Strapped" was really interesting. It's about a gay prostitute ssdsdsdd but I swear it's not as basic as I'm making it sound

And "weekend" & "shank"

now even though its depressing THIS is, to me, the best gay movie out there. yes its an indie drama, but its realistic. not some heightened dramatic mess about aids, and cheating at glory holes or someone dying and whatnot :dead:

just two guys who meet at a bar, spend the weekend together before one of them fucks off to America. sad movie. but not some over the top cheap mess.

AND its not a 'gay' movie - its of the same calibre as some of the best indie movies out there, ya know, the 'blue valentine's and such...


death


SUPREME

Quote from: Baphomet. on January 30, 2016, 10:54:45 PM
where the FUCK is the gay version of The Notebook and The Time Travelers Wife ?


omg

Time travelers is one of my favorite movies EVER

One of the few to make me emotional


BAPHOMET.

Quote from: SUPREME on January 30, 2016, 11:12:06 PM
Quote from: Baphomet. on January 30, 2016, 10:54:45 PM
where the FUCK is the gay version of The Notebook and The Time Travelers Wife ?


omg

Time travelers is one of my favorite movies EVER

One of the few to make me emotional



I have it on Blu-Ray. I haven't watched it in a few years though.
Last time I watched it I got a mild headache because of that endiing.

The way she was RUNNING to see him again. .... I lose it everytime.



∧ ∨ ∩ ∪

Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 10:46:06 PM
n

TV embracing gays, Films are diminishing them wtf

tv aint no better

gays always painted as something stereotypical

- bitchy
- flamboyant
- queeny
- a funny sidekick
- a ho

like, not every fag is a queen who fucks a hundred people a week. and another thing - they always make them smooth muscled pretty white hunks. its so damn fucking boring. and totally unrealistic.

where are the regular guys? the average joes? the ones who don't act like the above, the ones who act like their straight counterparts? oh that's right, we don't act like them. no, we couldn't possibly. we're not normal you see. we always have to be some heightened version of someone's stereotypical image. otherwise, what would be the point of us right?

SMH fuck everything that features gays at the moment :dead:

If they're "regular" what's the point of putting them on TV?

yekim

Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 11:22:08 PM
Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 10:46:06 PM
n

TV embracing gays, Films are diminishing them wtf

tv aint no better

gays always painted as something stereotypical

- bitchy
- flamboyant
- queeny
- a funny sidekick
- a ho

like, not every fag is a queen who fucks a hundred people a week. and another thing - they always make them smooth muscled pretty white hunks. its so damn fucking boring. and totally unrealistic.

where are the regular guys? the average joes? the ones who don't act like the above, the ones who act like their straight counterparts? oh that's right, we don't act like them. no, we couldn't possibly. we're not normal you see. we always have to be some heightened version of someone's stereotypical image. otherwise, what would be the point of us right?

SMH fuck everything that features gays at the moment :dead:

If they're "regular" what's the point of putting them on TV?

but its okay to have 99% of tv filled with "regular" straight characters? but when they decide to throw in a fag, he cant be a "regular" character too, it has to be some stereotypical bullshit? fags are "regular" people too ya know...

∧ ∨ ∩ ∪

There is this foreign film about a young man in boarding school who was molested (I think) he grew up to be a prostitute tranny and ended up being murdered. The whole movie was on the back story and told in 3rd person.

I've been trying to find this movie for the past 3 years. I caught it one time when I came on TV on the late late night and haven't seen it since.

∧ ∨ ∩ ∪

Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 11:25:16 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 11:22:08 PM
Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 10:46:06 PM
n

TV embracing gays, Films are diminishing them wtf

tv aint no better

gays always painted as something stereotypical

- bitchy
- flamboyant
- queeny
- a funny sidekick
- a ho

like, not every fag is a queen who fucks a hundred people a week. and another thing - they always make them smooth muscled pretty white hunks. its so damn fucking boring. and totally unrealistic.

where are the regular guys? the average joes? the ones who don't act like the above, the ones who act like their straight counterparts? oh that's right, we don't act like them. no, we couldn't possibly. we're not normal you see. we always have to be some heightened version of someone's stereotypical image. otherwise, what would be the point of us right?

SMH fuck everything that features gays at the moment :dead:

If they're "regular" what's the point of putting them on TV?

but its okay to have 99% of tv filled with "regular" straight characters? but when they decide to throw in a fag, he cant be a "regular" character too, it has to be some stereotypical bullshit? fags are "regular" people too ya know...

Please read what you're saying and think logically. If they have regular straight characters on TV what is the purpose of putting a straight acting faggot on TV :uhh: like

yekim

Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 11:26:56 PM
Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 11:25:16 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 11:22:08 PM
Quote from: yekim on January 30, 2016, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: H??R?R∆Ń on January 30, 2016, 10:46:06 PM
n

TV embracing gays, Films are diminishing them wtf

tv aint no better

gays always painted as something stereotypical

- bitchy
- flamboyant
- queeny
- a funny sidekick
- a ho

like, not every fag is a queen who fucks a hundred people a week. and another thing - they always make them smooth muscled pretty white hunks. its so damn fucking boring. and totally unrealistic.

where are the regular guys? the average joes? the ones who don't act like the above, the ones who act like their straight counterparts? oh that's right, we don't act like them. no, we couldn't possibly. we're not normal you see. we always have to be some heightened version of someone's stereotypical image. otherwise, what would be the point of us right?

SMH fuck everything that features gays at the moment :dead:

If they're "regular" what's the point of putting them on TV?

but its okay to have 99% of tv filled with "regular" straight characters? but when they decide to throw in a fag, he cant be a "regular" character too, it has to be some stereotypical bullshit? fags are "regular" people too ya know...

Please read what you're saying and think logically. If they have regular straight characters on TV what is the purpose of putting a straight acting faggot on TV :uhh: like

im not going to dignify that with a response. have a lovely night :ttlo:

∧ ∨ ∩ ∪