Home

[CHOKE]

Jsjsjdjdjdjdjddkdkrkfkr

There really is no way to justify how trifling this is

[L0NZ.]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

[L0NZ.]

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

[stillpretty]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

so there's pics of gorls wearing this t-shirt to their nephew's piano recital?

i just see a pic of a t-shirt.

sffsfssf

this is what im talking about. ur creating and criticizing a scenario that isn't even in front of us.
this is an assumption that people will wear it irresponsibly.

[L0NZ.]

I think the most off putting thin about it for me is the people who are interested in buying it like THEY don't watch porn. OMG!!! NEED IT!! SPECTACULAR! BITTch!

Like it's a 5 minute drawing of two niggers fucking. But revolutionary!

[L0NZ.]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

so there's pics of gorls wearing this t-shirt to their nephew's piano recital?

i just see a pic of a t-shirt.

sffsfssf

this is what im talking about. ur creating and criticizing a scenario that isn't even in front of us.
this is an assumption that people will wear it irresponsibly.

Dance recital! Church! Girl.

Anyway yes there are photos of people wearing similar items of clothing in malls where there were absolutely children around Im sure. One being those jeans with the legs and long dicks painted on them. Lets not act like wearing/using things irresponsibly is so beyond the mindset of people today?

[stillpretty]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

so there's pics of gorls wearing this t-shirt to their nephew's piano recital?

i just see a pic of a t-shirt.

sffsfssf

this is what im talking about. ur creating and criticizing a scenario that isn't even in front of us.
this is an assumption that people will wear it irresponsibly.

Dance recital! Church! Girl.

Anyway yes there are photos of people wearing similar items of clothing in malls where there were absolutely children around Im sure. One being those jeans with the legs and long dicks painted on them. Lets not act like wearing/using things irresponsibly is so beyond the mindset of people today?

ive personally never seen people walking around with people having sex on their t-shirts on a regular basis.

and i live in ATL, the world's capital of extraness. sfsffssf
and there's def no shortage of sexual attire for the gorls to wear so it's not a supply issue.

are we mistaking edgy exceptions (people thirsty enough for attention to do those things in everyday settings) for the norm?

if so, of course there's plenty of room to assume the people supporting and buying this product will jump at opportunities to wear it to the corner store, instead of the club.

[L0NZ.]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

so there's pics of gorls wearing this t-shirt to their nephew's piano recital?

i just see a pic of a t-shirt.

sffsfssf

this is what im talking about. ur creating and criticizing a scenario that isn't even in front of us.
this is an assumption that people will wear it irresponsibly.

Dance recital! Church! Girl.

Anyway yes there are photos of people wearing similar items of clothing in malls where there were absolutely children around Im sure. One being those jeans with the legs and long dicks painted on them. Lets not act like wearing/using things irresponsibly is so beyond the mindset of people today?

ive personally never seen people walking around with people having sex on their t-shirts on a regular basis.

and i live in ATL, the world's capital of extraness. sfsffssf
and there's def no shortage of sexual attire for the gorls to wear so it's not a supply issue.

are we mistaking edgy exceptions (people thirsty enough for attention to do those things in everyday settings) for the norm?

Are we joujing up our positions for the sake of taking the conversation out of context? Who said anything about that? The norm, "regularly?" The edgy exceptions are the only people interested in this. And yes I have the analytics.

[Barbie Dangerous]

Of all things, the gorls are really clutching their pearls over THIS?

[L0NZ.]

What are the other things boy.

[L0NZ.]

So I can point you to the girls clutching things over them too.

[stillpretty]

We watch porn but dont need to see it out in public on someone's tshirt. Have some class.

EXCEPT for the gay club or some mess

so there's pics of gorls wearing this t-shirt to their nephew's piano recital?

i just see a pic of a t-shirt.

sffsfssf

this is what im talking about. ur creating and criticizing a scenario that isn't even in front of us.
this is an assumption that people will wear it irresponsibly.

Dance recital! Church! Girl.

Anyway yes there are photos of people wearing similar items of clothing in malls where there were absolutely children around Im sure. One being those jeans with the legs and long dicks painted on them. Lets not act like wearing/using things irresponsibly is so beyond the mindset of people today?

ive personally never seen people walking around with people having sex on their t-shirts on a regular basis.

and i live in ATL, the world's capital of extraness. sfsffssf
and there's def no shortage of sexual attire for the gorls to wear so it's not a supply issue.

are we mistaking edgy exceptions (people thirsty enough for attention to do those things in everyday settings) for the norm?

Are we j -

watch that tone ho

[𝖘𝖖𝖚𝖎𝖉]

No one is clutching their pearls, faggots. It's just cringe, period.

[JCJ]

A lot of the gays in the comments were like "oh I'll where this to the grocery store!"

[Barbie Dangerous]

I really pissed y'all off with that comment I see.