LONG POST ALERT
A few notes, from one journalist to another:
Environment:
The setting wasn't bad. I'd go for a place with less ambient noise or consider different mic options. Also, the eyes wander in locations like this. I'd be careful with competing visuals during such a lengthy interview.
Presence:
It's great to see you on film. You have a good look for video. Try not to move so much in view of the camera. It's a bit distracting. Also, your positioning with Dawn was a bit awkward. I'd do more thoughtful space planning so you're not constantly turning towards or away from the camera.
Relation With Subject:
You did a phenomenal job using your own anecdotes to make Dawn feel more comfortable and ground the interview. I also helped transition from question to question. That was great!
Length:
A near 40-minute video is almost indigestible. Cutting it up will serve you well, especially if you want other news outlets to pick it up. For example, the bit about her sexual proclivities could easily be fed to Madam Noire, Essence, etc. And they would run it. But, only if there is a segment of that highlight. You can do that with a lot of different parts of the interview and that's a sign of a strong Q&A.
Transitions:
Most journalists have trouble transitioning from question to question and you didn't. Your pace is great and you flowed really well throughout. You can see that Dawn was comfortable and appreciative that you did your homework. It made it nice to watch.
Overall, I enjoyed the interview. You have great energy, a confident presence and with some polishing you can really make an impact.
Sorry if I come across like a professor. I taught journalism and interviewing techniques at NYU before I left New York. Anywho, really great job. Look forward to seeing more of your work bruv.
