Home

[fedswatchin]

xzccxz nicki sucks

you're fuming

[wizzy]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

ggggggggggggggggggggg
"Was there even any NUT in her?!?!"

was there?

was there?

cccvccc

[L0NZ.]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

didnt say that one but
no way is that possible huh?

you certainly did, though not verbatim. You said something about cross contamination by a means other than direct bodily contact. No matter how I recollect it, it was still in defense. You did defend him.

no I didn't defend him
I offered possible scenarios like that
as a reason his sister whom I did defend would give him benefit of the doubt

The benefit of the doubt is plausible when theres no proof of wrongdoing. But when theres evidence, its defense. To try and find twists and turns to explain why someone might be innocent, with evidence and a charge against them, is what defense attorneys do. So yeah.

[fedswatchin]

The way that all of y'all are gon rush to watch the video premiere

[L0NZ.]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

ggggggggggggggggggggg
"Was there even any NUT in her?!?!"

was there?

was there?

cccvccc

screaming

[fedswatchin]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

didnt say that one but
no way is that possible huh?

you certainly did, though not verbatim. You said something about cross contamination by a means other than direct bodily contact. No matter how I recollect it, it was still in defense. You did defend him.

no I didn't defend him
I offered possible scenarios like that
as a reason his sister whom I did defend would give him benefit of the doubt

The benefit of the doubt is plausible when theres no proof of wrongdoing. But when theres evidence, its defense. To try and find twists and turns to explain why someone might be innocent, with evidence and a charge against them, is what defense attorneys do. So yeah.

so what's the issue?

[L0NZ.]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

didnt say that one but
no way is that possible huh?

you certainly did, though not verbatim. You said something about cross contamination by a means other than direct bodily contact. No matter how I recollect it, it was still in defense. You did defend him.

no I didn't defend him
I offered possible scenarios like that
as a reason his sister whom I did defend would give him benefit of the doubt

The benefit of the doubt is plausible when theres no proof of wrongdoing. But when theres evidence, its defense. To try and find twists and turns to explain why someone might be innocent, with evidence and a charge against them, is what defense attorneys do. So yeah.

so what's the issue?

oh Ray said he never defended Nickis pedo brother

[fedswatchin]

What does nicki even have to do with her brother?

the LENGTHS y'all will go to hate. Am just happy nicki will never be a dumb JAILbird ass broad, havin to rot in a cell for months on end, like Krim and Rem'. Woo!

Nick >>

[RAY7]

Didn't defend her brother btw

d

ddddd

"what if he brushed up against her with dried cum on his shirt and thats how it got there!?!"

didnt say that one but
no way is that possible huh?

you certainly did, though not verbatim. You said something about cross contamination by a means other than direct bodily contact. No matter how I recollect it, it was still in defense. You did defend him.

no I didn't defend him
I offered possible scenarios like that
as a reason his sister whom I did defend would give him benefit of the doubt

The benefit of the doubt is plausible when theres no proof of wrongdoing. But when theres evidence, its defense. To try and find twists and turns to explain why someone might be innocent, with evidence and a charge against them, is what defense attorneys do. So yeah.

ok but I didn't give benefit of the doubt Nicki did so if she is defending him then she is and the scenarios I named are examples of why she would
So I didn't defend him

[L0NZ.]

What does nicki even have to do with her brother?

is this for me? Im talking about Ray and her brother.

[Admin]

[FlowerBomb]

the LENGTHS y'all will go to hate.

[GRAND]

I guess you needed a PAP

[/quote]

[Opposites Attract.]

12 13 Pages full of fumes

[fedswatchin]

I cop to my hate. That's the difference