Started by Mel., August 24, 2017, 01:38:41 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:40:06 PMQuote from: BowDown on August 24, 2017, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:34:18 PMThe reason Justin was forgiven is because CBS asked Justin and Janet to both attend the GRAMMYs, a week later, and apologize.Janet refused. Justin did.It's business. Period. You don't go onstage and flash your breast at the biggest and most watched family event of the year. MTV had a contract to produce the Super Bowl Half Time Show every 3 years, and because of Janet, they lost it. Clear Channel, CBS & the NFL paid so much money in fines & attorney fees. She played the wrong hand, and wouldn't cooperate when it was all said and done.Then, had the audacity to follow it up with an album where she was naked on several men's magazines including KING. She was such a dummy.That Britney/Madonna kiss, 5 months prior, really did a number on her. Janet was BANNED form the Grammys. She was not. She was asked to attend with Justin and apologize.And refused.
Quote from: BowDown on August 24, 2017, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:34:18 PMThe reason Justin was forgiven is because CBS asked Justin and Janet to both attend the GRAMMYs, a week later, and apologize.Janet refused. Justin did.It's business. Period. You don't go onstage and flash your breast at the biggest and most watched family event of the year. MTV had a contract to produce the Super Bowl Half Time Show every 3 years, and because of Janet, they lost it. Clear Channel, CBS & the NFL paid so much money in fines & attorney fees. She played the wrong hand, and wouldn't cooperate when it was all said and done.Then, had the audacity to follow it up with an album where she was naked on several men's magazines including KING. She was such a dummy.That Britney/Madonna kiss, 5 months prior, really did a number on her. Janet was BANNED form the Grammys.
Quote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:34:18 PMThe reason Justin was forgiven is because CBS asked Justin and Janet to both attend the GRAMMYs, a week later, and apologize.Janet refused. Justin did.It's business. Period. You don't go onstage and flash your breast at the biggest and most watched family event of the year. MTV had a contract to produce the Super Bowl Half Time Show every 3 years, and because of Janet, they lost it. Clear Channel, CBS & the NFL paid so much money in fines & attorney fees. She played the wrong hand, and wouldn't cooperate when it was all said and done.Then, had the audacity to follow it up with an album where she was naked on several men's magazines including KING. She was such a dummy.That Britney/Madonna kiss, 5 months prior, really did a number on her.
Quote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tribute
Quote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:46:34 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tributeShe was not allowed to appear if she would not apologize.Listen, it's work. CBS and Clear Channel were still the ones in charge of the GRAMMYs. I mean, it was the same network. Why would she NOT be banned if she wasn't going to play by their rules? I think they were absolutely in the right. Janet pulled a stunt that caused a lot of people their jobs.
Quote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:49:02 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:46:34 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tributeShe was not allowed to appear if she would not apologize.Listen, it's work. CBS and Clear Channel were still the ones in charge of the GRAMMYs. I mean, it was the same network. Why would she NOT be banned if she wasn't going to play by their rules? I think they were absolutely in the right. Janet pulled a stunt that caused a lot of people their jobs.She already had a televised apology
Quote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:49:58 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:49:02 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:46:34 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tributeShe was not allowed to appear if she would not apologize.Listen, it's work. CBS and Clear Channel were still the ones in charge of the GRAMMYs. I mean, it was the same network. Why would she NOT be banned if she wasn't going to play by their rules? I think they were absolutely in the right. Janet pulled a stunt that caused a lot of people their jobs.She already had a televised apologyOn her own!Not at a CBS/Viacom event. That's then difference. She made the choice to say she wouldn't apologize again, and the rest is history.
Quote from: Mel. on August 24, 2017, 03:34:01 PMAre we still on Janet?love her, but she brought it on herself, no one told her to flash her breastshe did that and was dealt consequences for it...NEXT.
Quote from: BowDown on August 24, 2017, 04:51:09 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:49:58 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:49:02 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:46:34 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tributeShe was not allowed to appear if she would not apologize.Listen, it's work. CBS and Clear Channel were still the ones in charge of the GRAMMYs. I mean, it was the same network. Why would she NOT be banned if she wasn't going to play by their rules? I think they were absolutely in the right. Janet pulled a stunt that caused a lot of people their jobs.She already had a televised apologyOn her own!Not at a CBS/Viacom event. That's then difference. She made the choice to say she wouldn't apologize again, and the rest is history.The apology was shot and broadcasted via CBS hun..
Quote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:52:43 PMQuote from: BowDown on August 24, 2017, 04:51:09 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:49:58 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:49:02 PMQuote from: XXX. on August 24, 2017, 04:46:34 PMQuote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:43:05 PMShe was bannedShe had already apologised on television before the Grammys, she was already scheduled to present the Luther Vandross tributeShe was not allowed to appear if she would not apologize.Listen, it's work. CBS and Clear Channel were still the ones in charge of the GRAMMYs. I mean, it was the same network. Why would she NOT be banned if she wasn't going to play by their rules? I think they were absolutely in the right. Janet pulled a stunt that caused a lot of people their jobs.She already had a televised apologyOn her own!Not at a CBS/Viacom event. That's then difference. She made the choice to say she wouldn't apologize again, and the rest is history.The apology was shot and broadcasted via CBS hun..That's what I'm saying. It was a solo apology. Not at a CBS event! If she wanted to participate, they wanted another apology.She refused.What are you not getting?
Quote from: Amir on August 24, 2017, 04:52:56 PMYh she had a televised apology already done for CBS Justin didn't apologise publicly anywhere but he wasn't blacklisted.
QuoteCBS: Apology was requirement for him to appear at GrammysSunday, February 8, 2004 Posted: 11:30 PM EST (0430 GMT)LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- A week after he pulled the covering off Janet Jackson's right breast during the Super Bowl halftime show, singer Justin Timberlake apologized again as he accepted the Grammy for best male pop vocal performance.A statement from CBS said Timberlake's apology was a requirement for his participation in the broadcast. The network said Jackson declined the invitation to appear and apologize.
Quote from: Baph al Mana. on August 24, 2017, 04:10:55 PMQuote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on August 24, 2017, 04:08:57 PMMore White privilegeQuote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on August 24, 2017, 11:32:50 AMReinvent a bit then Tay! b
Quote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on August 24, 2017, 04:08:57 PMMore White privilege
Quote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on August 24, 2017, 11:32:50 AMReinvent a bit then Tay!