Home

[🦚]

I don't think he's denying his presence at the shoot - he's saying that he never agreed to that pose in particular and didn't give consent for her to use his image commercially.

She should have had him to sign something explaining the clear purpose of her intent with the image - chances are he's flat out lying about this all (in regards to his obliviousness) but it could be a case. The image is basically softcore porn He could claim its caused damage to his reputation, emotional distress,  and blah blah blah blah.

So you just going to ignore that it?s a whole other nigga in the pic? Wtf

[ya rock muh world.]

hi80gu

I didn't see that post.

But even though people's appearances don't come with a copyright stamped into their neck, it's still certain rights you have. Which is why people have to sign off before they do TV shows, etc. Theyre using their image and likeness for profit. It would have been a  case ..IF it were him.