Home

[fedswatchin]

https://twitter.com/eddie_dude/status/1112559576279330816

dance to her cover Mulan!

[Vonc2002]

Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on

[Navyman]

Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on

She can still able to monetize it. And if she owned the masters for this song, it would be for this recording since rolling stone signed off everything regarding the record to her when they heard the song.

[Drogon]

Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on

[fedswatchin]

Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on

You didn't scroll down to see tonk's logic before quoting some bullshit

[Vonc2002]

Lemme cut to it, ciara ain't making no money off of this

[Drogon]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however they receive like 100 percent of all profit

[Navyman]

She is 

[Navyman]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit

You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract 


Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.

[Drogon]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit

You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract 


Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.

I love her version

Ci doesn't even have the record registered

[Hiroshimoto]

Lemme cut to it, ciara ain't making no money off of this

ARE YOU DUMB ?

[Navyman]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit

You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract 


Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.

I love her version

Ci doesn't even have the record registered

Where are you looking?

[Drogon]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit

You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract 


Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.

I love her version

Ci doesn't even have the record registered

Where are you looking?

If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages


http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True

[Navyman]

Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments

Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit

You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract 


Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.

I love her version

Ci doesn't even have the record registered

Where are you looking?

If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages


http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True

I'm gonna check it out. But look on ASCAP that's Ciara's publishing, it would be under there for her version.

[Navyman]

Nvm it's not that deep. I hate going to ASCAP, you gotta sign up and then pay to login to view majority of the good stuff.