Home

[Herb.]

Understand the context before making comments inapplicable to the situation at hand. If the question is general, the answer or discussion is general too.

You know what they say about people who assume...

Well the discussion at hand was in regards to my feelings about people killing animals for fun and sport....Jacob and I were having that discussion...well, before you chimed in.

So maybe it's important you understand the context before jumping in next time. We're done lol

Bitch ho   

mmmmmmmm

[Miranda]

Understand the context before making comments inapplicable to the situation at hand. If the question is general, the answer or discussion is general too.

You know what they say about people who assume...

Well the discussion at hand was in regards to my feelings about people killing animals for fun and sport....

Not it was not. Why are you lying? The discussion was about Stew's veganism mess and whether it is ok to butcher animals, and everybody including you brought their own perspective to HIS discussion. This seems a bit self-absorbed to think your feelings were the core of the discussion, they were not, they were your feelings towards it.

[Miranda]

not to go off topic but your thread really got me thinking

there was a time when blacks were just seen as animals and 'property'.....we were seen as lesser than (well its still going on today)

yet we do the same exact thing to animals and don't even want to acknowledge it...we think its fine to butcher and slaughter animals but are so cowardly and weak that we cant even watch them get butchered .....kjjgh there's so much hypocrisy and selfcenteredness in this world

This right here, is the essence of the discussion.

Read and read carefully. Everything that followed was a reaction to THIS. Not a reaction to YOU.

[Miranda]

Butchering very, very strongly implies EATING them. You took his statement for something it wasn't and made it your own "Squat flies for fun" mess, which was besides the point. If this was an essay or a debate, you would get an F for missing the topic.

[Bentley!]

What's going on?

[Stewie]

Excuse ME?   

jjhghjgggg this satanic wig
sadfkjakdhsfjashdfjhsdfhsjdhfdsf

[Miranda]

Two wins, one day.

King of Debate, tbh.

[Young]

What just happened

[yummy]

King of Debate, tbh.

v

[tigernathan]

This thread title fjjjj

[Herb.]

This thread title fjjjj

lil sis

[Young]

Wow Malcom

U got me Jayden and af in  the same day. Good job.

You actually made sense and were right in both threads

n

The world must be ending

[Miranda]

Wow Malcom

U got me Jayden and af in  the same day. Good job.

You actually made sense and were right in both threads

nnn

Luv you too, sis.

[L0NZ.]

Do yall consider the killing of lobster as slaughter?

[Herb.]

Wow Malcom

U got me and Jayden

I ended my discussion with him because clearly his posts were addressing Jacob, not me. I assumed he was addressing me and responded as such. Him accusing me of straying from my stance still makes no sense. It remained consistent throughout the thread.

He accused me of derailment, when my posts remained the same from the beginning to the end of the discussion. His accusation would make sense if I went from posting about vegan stuff into something different. This is where I took issue.

Maybe a little "self absorbed" to assume his replies were to my posts? I can agree. Derailed? Nope. He's still wrong. He did not specify whether he was addressing me or Jacob - which is quite essential considering that: 1) according to him, we were talking about two different things and 2) he posed a vaguely general question that either one of us could have answered -- either in regard to butchering for consumption or killing for sport.

And that's kind of it with me. You gorls can speak for yourselves.