Home

[BAPHOMET.]

I don't agree with it either. What if the condom breaks or slips off?

No ma'am

like.... 

[Nine]

Fck you

[GRAND ETERNAL SUPREME]

dslsdlkkskdskldslkds

[oph.]

That is what HIV healthcare workers and policy makers here advocate though. What they say is that safe sex is an individual responsibility. Persons should assume everyone is HIV positive and take necessary steps to have safe sex. I'm kinda torn on this, because I see their point. In a perfect world I  would want to know if someone is HIV before having sex with them. But I also believe persons have a right to privacy. If they are taking steps to practice safe sex and not deliberately trying to infect others, then the onus is on me as well to insist on protected sex, ask to conduct an HIV test before sex, or not have sex.

i agree we should all be taking steps to ensure our own sexual safety. and if having safe sex was a 100% sure fire way to prevent the mess then yes i could see what ur saying. but theres still that small percentage of a risk.

and ANY risk WARRANTS disclosure.

thats non-negotiable.

[Blamblam]

If you dare dip your dick in this beast you probably deserve what you get 

[Kalifornia.]

If you dare dip your dick in this beast you probably deserve what you get

hbbhvbhhjjjjjjjjj

[wizzy]

That is what HIV healthcare workers and policy makers here advocate though. What they say is that safe sex is an individual responsibility. Persons should assume everyone is HIV positive and take necessary steps to have safe sex. I'm kinda torn on this, because I see their point. In a perfect world I  would want to know if someone is HIV before having sex with them. But I also believe persons have a right to privacy. If they are taking steps to practice safe sex and not deliberately trying to infect others, then the onus is on me as well to insist on protected sex, ask to conduct an HIV test before sex, or not have sex.

i agree we should all be taking steps to ensure our own sexual safety. and if having safe sex was a 100% sure fire way to prevent the mess then yes i could see what ur saying. but theres still that small percentage of a risk.

and ANY risk WARRANTS disclosure.

thats non-negotiable.

!!!
and to assume that negative people just dont get checked or arent taking care of themselves is

[Kaeli.]

They need an HIV registry tbhon  

[❄️☃️🌨� Shuji Feels Different 🌨�☃️❄️]

That is what HIV healthcare workers and policy makers here advocate though. What they say is that safe sex is an individual responsibility. Persons should assume everyone is HIV positive and take necessary steps to have safe sex. I'm kinda torn on this, because I see their point. In a perfect world I  would want to know if someone is HIV before having sex with them. But I also believe persons have a right to privacy. If they are taking steps to practice safe sex and not deliberately trying to infect others, then the onus is on me as well to insist on protected sex, ask to conduct an HIV test before sex, or not have sex.

i agree we should all be taking steps to ensure our own sexual safety. and if having safe sex was a 100% sure fire way to prevent the mess then yes i could see what ur saying. but theres still that small percentage of a risk.

and ANY risk WARRANTS disclosure.

thats non-negotiable.

!!!
and to assume that negative people just dont get checked or arent taking care of themselves is

Who made that assumption?

[wizzy]

That is what HIV healthcare workers and policy makers here advocate though. What they say is that safe sex is an individual responsibility. Persons should assume everyone is HIV positive and take necessary steps to have safe sex. I'm kinda torn on this, because I see their point. In a perfect world I  would want to know if someone is HIV before having sex with them. But I also believe persons have a right to privacy. If they are taking steps to practice safe sex and not deliberately trying to infect others, then the onus is on me as well to insist on protected sex, ask to conduct an HIV test before sex, or not have sex.

i agree we should all be taking steps to ensure our own sexual safety. and if having safe sex was a 100% sure fire way to prevent the mess then yes i could see what ur saying. but theres still that small percentage of a risk.

and ANY risk WARRANTS disclosure.

thats non-negotiable.

!!!
and to assume that negative people just dont get checked or arent taking care of themselves is

Who made that assumption?

he did

[BAPHOMET.]

They need an HIV registry tbhon

[❄️☃️🌨� Shuji Feels Different 🌨�☃️❄️]

Oh. Didn't watch beyond the 1:00 minute mark.

[wizzy]

f
but yeah he's scorned and I cant imagine how horrible the responses are when he used to disclose
theres no excuse for not being upfront with your partner(s)

[BrokenHeartsHeal]

xbxxgx

why are they calling him boo boo? Are they mocking his sexuality? 

[Nine]

That is what HIV healthcare workers and policy makers here advocate though. What they say is that safe sex is an individual responsibility. Persons should assume everyone is HIV positive and take necessary steps to have safe sex. I'm kinda torn on this, because I see their point. In a perfect world I  would want to know if someone is HIV before having sex with them. But I also believe persons have a right to privacy. If they are taking steps to practice safe sex and not deliberately trying to infect others, then the onus is on me as well to insist on protected sex, ask to conduct an HIV test before sex, or not have sex.

i agree we should all be taking steps to ensure our own sexual safety. and if having safe sex was a 100% sure fire way to prevent the mess then yes i could see what ur saying. but theres still that small percentage of a risk.

and ANY risk WARRANTS disclosure.

thats non-negotiable.

!!!!