https://twitter.com/eddie_dude/status/1112559576279330816
:plzstop: dance to her cover Mulan!
Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 12:29:42 AM
Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on
She can still able to monetize it. And if she owned the masters for this song, it would be for this recording since rolling stone signed off everything regarding the record to her when they heard the song.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 12:29:42 AM
Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:43:26 AM
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 12:29:42 AM
Isn't paint it black a remake that ciara has no writing credits on
You didn't scroll down to see tonk's logic before quoting some bullshit
Lemme cut to it, ciara ain't making no money off of this :dead:
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however they receive like 100 percent of all profit
She is :hehe:
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 12:54:57 AM
Lemme cut to it, ciara ain't making no money off of this :dead:
ARE YOU DUMB ?
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
I'm gonna check it out. But look on ASCAP that's Ciara's publishing, it would be under there for her version.
Nvm it's not that deep. I hate going to ASCAP, you gotta sign up and then pay to login to view majority of the good stuff.
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 02:14:16 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
I'm gonna check it out. But look on ASCAP that's Ciara's publishing, it would be under there for her version.
I checked both BMI and ASCAP it's not there. She does have a mechanical licensing bc it's being sold, however there is no telling what kinda deal Epic did. I remember she did a interview and said Lionsgate asked her to do the record
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 02:17:27 AM
Nvm it's not that deep. I hate going to ASCAP, you gotta sign up and then pay to login to view majority of the good stuff.
:guys: Huh
You're right but I just go to
https://www.ascap.com/repertory
I aint signing up for their MESS
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:23:00 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 02:14:16 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
I'm gonna check it out. But look on ASCAP that's Ciara's publishing, it would be under there for her version.
I checked both BMI and ASCAP it's not there. She does have a mechanical licensing bc it's being sold, however there is no telling what kinda deal Epic did. I remember she did a interview and said Lionsgate asked her to do the record
Exactly! So you know what I'm talking about. That's the same interview where Rolling Stone the band themselves had talked about signing off on it etc...
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:25:18 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 02:17:27 AM
Nvm it's not that deep. I hate going to ASCAP, you gotta sign up and then pay to login to view majority of the good stuff.
:guys: Huh
You're right but I just go to
https://www.ascap.com/repertory
I aint signing up for their MESS
Thank you.
Their new website is shit :uhh:
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
Yea cause plenty of people have covered this. This girl ain't making no money from this :dead:
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 02:44:00 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:30:48 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 01:13:29 AM
Quote from: Tonkaman on April 01, 2019, 01:02:30 AM
Quote from: U.S. Border Patrol on April 01, 2019, 12:59:43 AM
Most times when artist sign off for you to re-record their songs they sign off for you to do so however they still receive the royalty payments
Just like Marvin Gaye his family allow his songs to be sampled however thet receive like 100 percent of all profit
You are correct they make a PERCENT of the remake. It also depends on the artist team, negotiations, the song. Etc.... so many moving factors that no one can pin point unless they were apart of that specific contract :dead:
Look at Aroan Grande giving over 90% of royalties away to that song. While some one else is paying less.
I love her version
Ci doesn't even have the record registered
Where are you looking?
If you look on BMI the Rolling Stones own 100 percent of the publishing. They've let lots of ppl cover the record however they maintained 100 percent of publishing. When you click on ppl who have covered it it goes back to the Rolling Stones and doesn't show a split of percentages
http://repertoire.bmi.com/DetailView.aspx?detail=titleid&keyid=1147261&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&blnAltTitles=True
Yea cause plenty of people have covered this. This girl ain't making no money from this :dead:
Read the rest of the conversation BOY
Quote from: Vonc2002 on April 01, 2019, 12:54:57 AM
Lemme cut to it, ciara ain't making no money off of this :dead:
She got her mechanical licenses on. So she is :hehe: