Home

[NEW MOON]

Claudia li

Well.The only other black billionaires in entertainment I can think of are Byron Allen and Robert Johnson.And I doubt was them.

Claudia literally posted a pic of that Robert Smith guy to her insta and did NOT post Tyler

the gorls happily skimmed right over me clocking that and sharing it

today was the day for me. Like Christian do SOMETHING to clear Tyler. NOW.

cuz i knew if it didn't come within the next day or two...

BITCH!

Because Robert Smiths voice is not recognizable. Christian said everyone would know this man just by his voice alone. And he  made the distinction the man who people are alleging is Robert was different from the person who asked him to strip Down for 100k

robert's voice being "recognizable" or not is so subjective

That's semantics.

If someone is known by their voice by most of the general public, the point is they are easier to distinguish from someone most people aren't familiar with.

this Robert Smith guy

This is not the way you refer to someone that "the world celebrates."

this Robert Smith guy is celebrated - in mainstream media.

article from CNN - that claudia posted to her stories btw:

What other clue do we have that it may be Robert Smith, besides the timing of Claudia's post?

None...but there are several that point to Tyler.

[NEW MOON]

Claudia li

Well.The only other black billionaires in entertainment I can think of are Byron Allen and Robert Johnson.And I doubt was them.

Claudia literally posted a pic of that Robert Smith guy to her insta and did NOT post Tyler

the gorls happily skimmed right over me clocking that and sharing it

today was the day for me. Like Christian do SOMETHING to clear Tyler. NOW.

cuz i knew if it didn't come within the next day or two...

BITCH!

Because Robert Smiths voice is not recognizable. Christian said everyone would know this man just by his voice alone. And he  made the distinction the man who people are alleging is Robert was different from the person who asked him to strip Down for 100k

robert's voice being "recognizable" or not is so subjective

That's semantics.

If someone is known by their voice by most of the general public, the point is they are easier to distinguish from someone most people aren't familiar with.

this Robert Smith guy

This is not the way you refer to someone that "the world celebrates."

this Robert Smith guy is celebrated - in mainstream media.

article from CNN - that claudia posted to her stories btw:

What other clue do we have that it may be Robert Smith, besides the timing of Claudia's post?

"besides the timing of Claudia's post" as if it doesnt include side eyes and a whole monologue she included immediately afterwards talking about the accusations

let's not act like its just the timing.

But it's not a fact.

How are you picking and choose what clues you wanna lead with. 

[Dee]

Claudia li

Well.The only other black billionaires in entertainment I can think of are Byron Allen and Robert Johnson.And I doubt was them.

Claudia literally posted a pic of that Robert Smith guy to her insta and did NOT post Tyler

the gorls happily skimmed right over me clocking that and sharing it

today was the day for me. Like Christian do SOMETHING to clear Tyler. NOW.

cuz i knew if it didn't come within the next day or two...

BITCH!

Because Robert Smiths voice is not recognizable. Christian said everyone would know this man just by his voice alone. And he  made the distinction the man who people are alleging is Robert was different from the person who asked him to strip Down for 100k

robert's voice being "recognizable" or not is so subjective

That's semantics.

If someone is known by their voice by most of the general public, the point is they are easier to distinguish from someone most people aren't familiar with.

thats not semantics.

he literally just said the person's voice is distinctive.

ultimately, what he was trying to get across is that a clear identification could be made by listening to the audio he has.  making his proof well...bulletproof.

i see people in here saying "robert smith doesn't have a recognizable voice."

this Robert Smith guy is apparently very well known as well.

and you're saying Tyler is "known for his voice" but i think a lot of people are thinking MADEA when they think Tyler. They even say "Madea" in place of his real name. that character and "her" voice are VERY well known part of Tyler's brand.

His actual , natural speaking voice - I wouldn't say that's what he's "known for". It's a stretch. As if he's a radio talkshow host or something.

and i think thats tripping people up a bit.

I'm sor', but even Tyler's actual speaking voice is quite familiar to most.

Any tom, dick or harry would automatically clock Tyler's mess. Nobody sounds like him. Very distinctive like everyone has been saying. Tbh

[The Only BLACK Kalmyks]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

[L0NZ.]

Claudia li

Well.The only other black billionaires in entertainment I can think of are Byron Allen and Robert Johnson.And I doubt was them.

Claudia literally posted a pic of that Robert Smith guy to her insta and did NOT post Tyler

the gorls happily skimmed right over me clocking that and sharing it

today was the day for me. Like Christian do SOMETHING to clear Tyler. NOW.

cuz i knew if it didn't come within the next day or two...

BITCH!

Because Robert Smiths voice is not recognizable. Christian said everyone would know this man just by his voice alone. And he  made the distinction the man who people are alleging is Robert was different from the person who asked him to strip Down for 100k

robert's voice being "recognizable" or not is so subjective

That's semantics.

If someone is known by their voice by most of the general public, the point is they are easier to distinguish from someone most people aren't familiar with.

this Robert Smith guy

This is not the way you refer to someone that "the world celebrates."

this Robert Smith guy is celebrated - in mainstream media.

article from CNN - that claudia posted to her stories btw:

What other clue do we have that it may be Robert Smith, besides the timing of Claudia's post?

"besides the timing of Claudia's post" as if it doesnt include side eyes and a whole monologue she included immediately afterwards talking about the accusations

let's not act like its just the timing.

So no other clues? Got it.

I can't see Claudia being that reckless as to implicate someone in a situation like this where her friend is hurting, and probably wants to proceed strategically. She knew what she was doing but you don't. You know how in the movies they recreate situations inspired by actual events? This is giving me "this is the type of thing the person in question does. Generous things. Donations! Community! Black excellence!" It's almost like she wanted to post this

https://twitter.com/MelissaDBrown7/status/1627563309779111936

Or any other examples of Tyler's Good Deeds. Pun intended.

[L0NZ.]

Christian literally is recounting stories of being invited to apartments to "make sure he's right for the part", while explaining that the person has his resume and knows what he's capable of in terms of acting, no need for a private audition.

He also talked about late night table reads, his conscience asking him if he's going to "take this role or that role for x amount of profit."

Does this sound like a billionaire investor (Robert), or a billionaire director and producer?

Boy.

We don't deify Robert. We dont know what Robert sounds like.

Now Im not saying it IS Tyler, but its def not Robert.

[NEW MOON]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

[The Only BLACK Kalmyks]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

someone making a distinction is still usually very clear, and can be without actually using the number 2

language like "there's another guy..."
"and this other guy im referring to"
"there was another instance with someone else"

was any of this language used?

[L0NZ.]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

was any of this language used?

omg so you really didn't listen?   

[The Only BLACK Kalmyks]

Claudia li

Well.The only other black billionaires in entertainment I can think of are Byron Allen and Robert Johnson.And I doubt was them.

Claudia literally posted a pic of that Robert Smith guy to her insta and did NOT post Tyler

the gorls happily skimmed right over me clocking that and sharing it

today was the day for me. Like Christian do SOMETHING to clear Tyler. NOW.

cuz i knew if it didn't come within the next day or two...

BITCH!

Because Robert Smiths voice is not recognizable. Christian said everyone would know this man just by his voice alone. And he  made the distinction the man who people are alleging is Robert was different from the person who asked him to strip Down for 100k

robert's voice being "recognizable" or not is so subjective

That's semantics.

If someone is known by their voice by most of the general public, the point is they are easier to distinguish from someone most people aren't familiar with.

this Robert Smith guy

This is not the way you refer to someone that "the world celebrates."

this Robert Smith guy is celebrated - in mainstream media.

article from CNN - that claudia posted to her stories btw:

What other clue do we have that it may be Robert Smith, besides the timing of Claudia's post?

"besides the timing of Claudia's post" as if it doesnt include side eyes and a whole monologue she included immediately afterwards talking about the accusations

let's not act like its just the timing.

So no ther clues? Got it.

I can't see Claudia being that reckless as to implicate someone in a situation like this where her friend is hurting, and probably wants to proceed strategically. She knew what she was doing but you don't. You know how in the movies they recreate situations inspired by actual events? This is giving me "this is the type of thing the person in question does. Generous things. Donations! Community! Black excellence!" It's almost like she wanted to post this

Or any other examples of Tyler's Good Deeds. Pun intended.

well that's a more sensible conclusion i guess

"she posted Robert, but she REALLY wanted to post Tyler "

[Dee]

Don't nobody know this damn man voice. Nobody but the college gorls

Tyler on the other hand...

[NEW MOON]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

someone making a distinction is still usually very clear, and can be without actually using the number 2

language like "there's another guy..."
"and this other guy im referring to"
"there was another instance with someone else"

was any of this language used?

So you didn't watch the video and listen for yourself? 

[The Only BLACK Kalmyks]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

someone making a distinction is still usually very clear, and can be without actually using the number 2

language like "there's another guy..."
"and this other guy im referring to"
"there was another instance with someone else"

was any of this language used?

So you didn't watch the video and listen for yourself? 

is tyler's name mentioned at any point?

otherwise i got the gist of whats in there.

its been bulletpointed to death

i dont see a need to sit and listen to him striptease this story for an hour

one bulletpoint i have yet to see though is this tag team mess you're introducing

[L0NZ.]

@NEW MOON

i had a question luv - in case u missed it here it is again:

You said that Chrisitan said there are two men involved.

did he actually and literally quantify the tea as in, saying "there are two men"

or is this another creative conclusion that you've stated as fact?

I said he made the "distinction" of two individual men.

It's just deductive reasoning if you actually watched the FULL video.

someone making a distinction is still usually very clear, and can be without actually using the number 2

language like "there's another guy..."
"and this other guy im referring to"
"there was another instance with someone else"

was any of this language used?

So you didn't watch the video and listen for yourself? 

i got the gist

Now see.

Ya'll. Let's go.

[L0NZ.]