NEW Michael Jackson allegations, authorities find kiddie porn

Started by Gilgamesh., June 21, 2016, 11:39:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nine


D.I.E.G.O.

Quote from: 1Rig on June 21, 2016, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: GoDiegoGo on June 21, 2016, 03:54:43 PM
Quote from: 1Rig on June 21, 2016, 03:53:08 PM
Quote from: Margeaux. on June 21, 2016, 03:51:18 PM


It's also insanely interesting to me how they swept that Glee kid and that Subway guy's mess under the rug. I'm utterly disgusted by it actually.
now see s;sdddddssdsd :uhh: they sure did. I'd forgotten all about that

That hasn't been swept under the rug. Mark Salling hasn't even gone to trial yet. Trust, his case is going to blow up. BUT you're talking about them in comparison to the BIGGEST pop star in history. No comparison
not even comparing them to MJ's situation at ALL

Just look at the Cosby situation  :dead: there is no trial and there's something being revealed each week

I get what you're saying. I think race plays into it as well.



The Brandy Barbie

June 21, 2016, 04:40:02 PM #64 Last Edit: June 21, 2016, 04:54:01 PM by The Brandy Barbie
Quote from: Margeaux. on June 21, 2016, 03:51:18 PM
and walked away with absolutely nothing. These kids haven't shown their faces since.

What a damn shame.


It's also insanely interesting to me how they swept that Glee kid and that Subway guy's mess under the rug. I'm utterly disgusted by it actually.

Yeah, that 7th Hevan guy, who was famous for playing this good ol' wholesome preacher, you would have thought they'd make a bigger deal of that, too.  It was pretty shocking, and the man admitted the allegations.  One of his victims has spoke on it.  And, I believe, just because everything happened so long ago, they just swept the whole thing under the rug.

4 fucking k



4 fucking k

A lot of credible sites are reporting this... Idk. I do remember reading about the raid and the police found a book of nude babies and young boys and MJ claimed that was a gift from his fans.  :dead:

Also there's that sealed document on Gavin claiming that MJ sodomized him as a young boy.

I believe he was a pedophile.


Sinpool

Quote from: ssw4919 on June 21, 2016, 12:20:06 PM
It's the same stuff they found over a decade ago.  If it was kiddie porn, he would have gone to jail for that.  That would have been the one thing for which they had proof.

If so then I definitely don't believe it because another site said he had sadistic torture porn of men women and children bloodied and beaten and stuff like this.

There's no way in hell they would have just skipped over that back then.


ssw4919

Quote from: 1Rig on June 21, 2016, 03:39:05 PM
Quote from: ssw4919 on June 21, 2016, 12:33:01 PM
They should make a miniseries on the trial like they did for OJ.  It's probably the second-biggest celebrity trial ever, and had interesting twists and turns.


During the trial, the kids were on the stand swearing up and down the Playboys the prosecution had were the ones Michael coerced them to view to arouse them.  The defense was like, "Are you sure?  :welllol: "

Yes, they were sure.

"Then explain how this issue was printed months after you last claim to have been in Neverland or seen Michael?  :butwait!:

:kii:  Faces cracked!  They were caught in so many lies during the trial.
Oh shit

:plzstop:

its their parents, really. they probably had a bunch of people in their ear talkin about how much money they could get away with



That's exactly what it was.  The reason the had other celebrities testify (like George Lopez, Jay Leno) is because the same family had tried to scam them out of money, too.  They used the boy's cancer to prey on celebs, and found an easy mark with Michael.  They also scammed and sued JC Penney.


Just like the 1993 case.  They discovered the allegations by putting their son under hypnosis and then went straight to try to get a civil case started (to get money) rather than cooperating with police and a criminal case.   :hmph:


The 2005 family TRIED to do the same thing with the same lawyer and everything, but laws had changed by then (largely because of the '93 case) which said you HAVE to do a criminal trial before you try to do a civil trial.


Michael should have never had kids running around his home, but I don't think he touched them. 

ssw4919

Gavin didn't claim Michael sodomized him.  That's easy to prove.  He said it was only oral sex, which is hard to prove.  Why would they seal something that said the man they were charging sodomized the victim?  Their whole legal case hinged on abuse, so why would they hide it? :whogonbook:

ssw4919

Quote from: dom on June 21, 2016, 04:46:20 PM
Quote from: ssw4919 on June 21, 2016, 12:13:20 PM
I don't believe it. 

not surprised you're a molester jackson stan... dyke



I mean, I objectively read trial transcripts and researched the cases.  I refuse to stan for a pedo, so I had to be sure.


Mike was innocent. :letsmessfag:

BAPHOMET.



4 fucking k

d

MJ was a pedo :uhh: and it was Wade but I'm sure you're going to say he's lying too jfjjj


Almost

Dailymail is always lying, but he still touched those kids

FRANCE

Listen, where there's smoke there's fire. Even IF Michael didnt do all these things, he did something and Im not here for it. But neither is he here, so it really doesnt matter anyways.