Home

[GLOCK]

I hope he has a good lawyer. He can easily sue for defamation of character and go after big $$$ like CNN, Dallas Police Department, and many other news sources that had his pic on their site as the suspect. He's going to be filthy rich. Hope he had someone to save the emails and screencaped all the news reports.

If he searches his name on Twitter ppl are fighting for him and dragging the DPD...

he's set 

[D.I.E.G.O.]

The tricky part about defamation is that there has to be malice of intent. The majority of news reports "alleged" or "reported" what they were being told. Many then offered retractions.

Hopefully, he has a good lawyer well-versed in these kind of suits. Large media companies bury these kinds of suits without blinking an eye.

[GLOCK]

Unless he was in custody and read his charges he was no ones suspect
He was an innocent bystander
He's getting paid

[D.I.E.G.O.]

f you think so?

[Vonc2002]

Well u don't have to be arrested and read charges to be a POI or suspect so i see what Diego is saying there

[Vonc2002]

f you think so?

sddsssss

[4 fucking k]

I'm so excited for him go king go!

[❄️☃️🌨� Shuji Feels Different 🌨�☃️❄️]

The tricky part about defamation is that there has to be malice of intent. The majority of news reports "alleged" or "reported" what they were being told. Many then offered retractions.

Hopefully, he has a good lawyer well-versed in these kind of suits. Large media companies bury these kinds of suits without blinking an eye.

One doesn't need to prove malice or intent to bring an action for libel though, which is what I'm sure the action will be brought for (if one is brought). As long as you present something inaccurately as fact that does harm to a person's character or reputation, you can be awarded substantial damages.

[KING BENTLEY.]

Who exactly is he going to sue?

the Sheriff's office on the county level. And the police department on the city level depending on where his mess was plastered as a suspect

But I guess the loophole is, he wasn't convicted or brought to trial and anybody can be a suspect "technically"

I think he's gonna get something tho from the wreckless way information was released.

But moreso HUSH money

[D.I.E.G.O.]

Who exactly is he going to sue?

the Sheriff's office on the county level. And the police department on the city level depending on where his mess was plastered as a suspect

But I guess the loophole is, he wasn't convicted or brought to trial and anybody can be a suspect "technically"

I think he's gonna get something tho from the wreckless way information was released.

But moreso HUSH money

I hope he gets a settlement or payout also. It may not be as quick and dry as I think some of us may want it to be.

[❄️☃️🌨� Shuji Feels Different 🌨�☃️❄️]

One damning thing for the police department is the fact that even when it was determined that he was no way involved, his picture remained up for an UNUSUALLY long time. Harm to his character is very easy to prove in this instance. Death threats, etc. They put his life in danger even after they determined he was not involved.

[Vonc2002]

The tricky part about defamation is that there has to be malice of intent. The majority of news reports "alleged" or "reported" what they were being told. Many then offered retractions.

Hopefully, he has a good lawyer well-versed in these kind of suits. Large media companies bury these kinds of suits without blinking an eye.

One doesn't need to prove malice or intent to bring an action for libel though, which is what I'm sure the action will be brought for (if one is brought). As long as you present something inaccurately as fact that does harm to a person's character or reputation, you can be awarded substantial damages.

Yea this is what i thought.  As long as i can show how it's been detrimental,  im good

[GLOCK]

Wow he's getting PAID
I won't see a dime but I'm excited that someone black is gonna some money LOLZ

[MAY]

He is so sexy

[D.I.E.G.O.]

bbb

Defamation of character claims require you to prove two things: 1. that what was said is completely untrue. 2. that the party(ies) who made such claims made them in an effort to cause harm.

The second part is what makes this form of tort law so damn complicated and difficult to prove.