Critically Acclaimed Male albums of 2016

Started by RAY7, October 31, 2016, 09:05:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


XXX.

Quote from: sadiddy? on October 31, 2016, 11:13:38 PM
Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 11:12:14 PM

pass those good genes down then KWEE :ohwow:

lovin this bag

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn


Shutup Afro!  :kii:

RatherBe

Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:43:37 PM
Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.
no you have it backwards, how did you skip from 8 to 20?
If the 8th review is bad then you can still have 12 more good ones to cover it up with 20
if you have 7 then one bad review has a bigger impact
If you've ever been into science experimentation or data collecting.. the more you collect the more accurate. You're not gonna get as good of a average data from 7 rather than 20




RAY7

November 01, 2016, 12:43:20 AM #49 Last Edit: November 01, 2016, 12:43:51 AM by AYR
Quote from: AJ on November 01, 2016, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:43:37 PM
Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.
no you have it backwards, how did you skip from 8 to 20?
If the 8th review is bad then you can still have 12 more good ones to cover it up with 20
if you have 7 then one bad review has a bigger impact
If you've ever been into science experimentation or data collecting.. the more you collect the more accurate. You're not gonna get as good of a average data from 7 rather than 20
exactly, which is why it says a lot that Ush came through with positive numbers with only 7 reviews,
its normal for an album with 20+ reviews to get a positive overall avg
as you said more data=more accuracy

XXX.

Quote from: AJ on November 01, 2016, 12:40:29 AM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:43:37 PM
Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.
no you have it backwards, how did you skip from 8 to 20?
If the 8th review is bad then you can still have 12 more good ones to cover it up with 20
if you have 7 then one bad review has a bigger impact
If you've ever been into science experimentation or data collecting.. the more you collect the more accurate. You're not gonna get as good of a average data from 7 rather than 20

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

:ATLcameo:  Sounds FINAL.

XXX.


RatherBe

Right more data= more accuracy

7 isn't as accurate



Zankou.


XXX.


RAY7

usually, but this album with 7
came through well
which means of the 7 the reviews are skewed to a positive slant

RAY7

cant really judge opinions on accuracy though


XXX.