Critically Acclaimed Male albums of 2016

Started by RAY7, October 31, 2016, 09:05:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RAY7

It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Real

Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:04:16 PM
Kanye, Kendrick & Chance all had 20-35 reviewers.

Only 7 critics even bothered to review Usher's mess.  Of course his score is high.  LOL.

Jesus


RAY7


RAY7

When the rebuttal shuts the shit down everyone is quiet

BAPHOMET.



Real


RAY7

They all did
if no one thought so none of them would have good scores

XXX.

Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.

FINE.

Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.
:plzstop: :plzstop: :plzstop:

RAY7

Quote from: BLOND?. on October 31, 2016, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:07:00 PM
It was the important reviewers though
but clearly it's harder to get a good score with less reviews because one bad one can knock the score back down easily

Ray, that's the point!

Meaning, if his 8th review is awful, the score could really be affected.  Hence, why it's more impressive to have a high score with over 20 reviews.  Not 7.
no you have it backwards, how did you skip from 8 to 20?
If the 8th review is bad then you can still have 12 more good ones to cover it up with 20
if you have 7 then one bad review has a bigger impact

Real

Ray's right about the math, but 7 reviews still ain't impressive

RAY7

Who cares about the number of reviews? There's not even that many really reputable sources most of the 20+ reviews is fluff
7 reviews from ppl like Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, Pitchfork etc>>>


XXX.

Quote from: AYR on October 31, 2016, 10:52:37 PM
Who cares about the number of reviews? There's not even that many really reputable sources most of the 20+ reviews is fluff
7 reviews from ppl like Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, Pitchfork etc>>>

But that's why it matters.  Based on the Metacritic scorecard, Pitchfork gave the album a 66%.  Entertainment Weekly gave it a 67%.

These "fluff" critics (which they're not) you're talking about.... if they were all included and say he had 5-8 more 60% reviews, his score would be much lower.  Which is why you can't compare it to albums with 30 reviews.

It's like showing someone a report card that's 4.0, but you only had 3 classes versus someone with a 3.8 who took 15 classes.

n