Started by RAY7, March 06, 2017, 11:11:51 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Gilgamesh. on March 07, 2017, 01:58:08 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 11:17:10 AMI've never heard anyone say Usher>Michael LOLZni'd never heard "Bruno > Usher" before this thread
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 11:17:10 AMI've never heard anyone say Usher>Michael LOLZ
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 02:12:50 PMQuote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 11:13:53 AMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 12:36:59 AMQuote from: Kaeli. on March 07, 2017, 12:33:19 AMNah Bruno is R&B now lolz Bruno > Usher.And most people are gonna agree with this. Everyone is raving over bruno and his new albumUsher is past his prime while Bruno is IN his prime, duh.At one point in time the media trashed Michael and embraced Usher... It's the circle of the industry.THIS is what u said dummy. U said the media will trash a legend to uplift a newcomer and Michael has never been trashed in favor of usher. We weren't talking about no damn sales. Who tf is arguing that Michael was selling like usher when one was well past his prime and one was at his peak. U scramble to say anything and always look like a damn fool in the process
Quote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 11:13:53 AMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 12:36:59 AMQuote from: Kaeli. on March 07, 2017, 12:33:19 AMNah Bruno is R&B now lolz Bruno > Usher.And most people are gonna agree with this. Everyone is raving over bruno and his new albumUsher is past his prime while Bruno is IN his prime, duh.At one point in time the media trashed Michael and embraced Usher... It's the circle of the industry.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 12:36:59 AMQuote from: Kaeli. on March 07, 2017, 12:33:19 AMNah Bruno is R&B now lolz Bruno > Usher.And most people are gonna agree with this. Everyone is raving over bruno and his new album
Quote from: Kaeli. on March 07, 2017, 12:33:19 AMNah Bruno is R&B now lolz Bruno > Usher.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 09:47:15 AMWell prince definitely had sex appeal. He was overt about it. Michael maybe TRIED to be a lil sexy but it wasn't believable. When u say sex appeal i think about those guys that were wanted by the women. Michael wasnt like a bobby brown (he was sought after back then), usher, trey songz type. Like everytime i see Michael after some girl in a video im like
Quote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 02:16:48 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 02:12:50 PMQuote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 11:13:53 AMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 12:36:59 AMQuote from: Kaeli. on March 07, 2017, 12:33:19 AMNah Bruno is R&B now lolz Bruno > Usher.And most people are gonna agree with this. Everyone is raving over bruno and his new albumUsher is past his prime while Bruno is IN his prime, duh.At one point in time the media trashed Michael and embraced Usher... It's the circle of the industry.THIS is what u said dummy. U said the media will trash a legend to uplift a newcomer and Michael has never been trashed in favor of usher. We weren't talking about no damn sales. Who tf is arguing that Michael was selling like usher when one was well past his prime and one was at his peak. U scramble to say anything and always look like a damn fool in the process Dummy, did the media not tarnish Michael's career while for child molestation/ failure of inviinvible while Usher was surging with 8701? Or do you need a fucking google map?
Quote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 02:14:47 PMWith Voncie's logic that's like saying Trey is better than R kelly because Trey has more recent success and acclaim Just DUMB
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 02:17:57 PMQuote from: Gilgamesh. on March 07, 2017, 01:58:08 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 11:17:10 AMI've never heard anyone say Usher>Michael LOLZni'd never heard "Bruno > Usher" before this thread An Usher/Bruno conversation is not the same as a Usher/Michael conversation, that's 1. Michael is a damn legend and my point is no one was trashing mike for usher. Usher AINT a damn legend and a convo about him and bruno is nothing but preferences. In closing, Bruno>Usher. Now be tf quiet, nigger
Quote from: Genesis on March 07, 2017, 02:22:06 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 02:17:57 PMQuote from: Gilgamesh. on March 07, 2017, 01:58:08 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 07, 2017, 11:17:10 AMI've never heard anyone say Usher>Michael LOLZni'd never heard "Bruno > Usher" before this thread An Usher/Bruno conversation is not the same as a Usher/Michael conversation, that's 1. Michael is a damn legend and my point is no one was trashing mike for usher. Usher AINT a damn legend and a convo about him and bruno is nothing but preferences. In closing, Bruno>Usher. Now be tf quiet, niggerNot even your clique agrees with you, that's how you KNOW you saying some dumb shit