Home

[Lane Bryant Jumpsuit]

A debater commits the Ad Hominem Fallacy when he introduces irrelevant personal premisses about his opponent. Such red herrings may successfully distract the opponent or the audience from the topic of the debate.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

You fags do this all the fucking time weak asses

[GRAND]

R u having a breakdown

[Lane Bryant Jumpsuit]

R u having a breakdown

No I am having a repairup

[Lane Bryant Jumpsuit]

Abusive: An Abusive Ad Hominem occurs when an attack on the character or other irrelevant personal qualities of the opposition?such as appearance?is offered as evidence against their position. Such attacks are often effective distractions ("red herrings"), because the opponents feel it necessary to defend themselves, thus being distracted from the topic of the debate.