Home

[AIDS]

q @ detaching my stanning

You people are weird as fuck

dsddddddddddddddddddddd

[AIDS]

You seem more upset at a young girl being "fast" than you do at a grown ass man thinking an eleven year old can consent to sex.

!

[GRAND]

And I?m still not getting why ppl keep assuming this is some fast 11 year old.

CCCVCCCXCCV

!!!

Yeah he's trash.... But find out.

[Barbie Dangerous]

You seem more upset at a young girl being "fast" than you do at a grown ass man thinking an eleven year old can consent to sex.

!

Exactly!!

[FlowerBomb]

I?ll probably get shit for saying this, but why was she often waking him up and laying next to him?  What kinda MESS?  Where was the mother?

Some shit is just inappropriate from the get go.  Nicki?s brother is extremely disturbed.  Not coaching her through anal and cumming in her mouth.

This testimony read like some freaky erotica novel.  Wow!  People are doing this shit everyday.

She was into it.

I?m sorry and I?m detaching my stanning away from this to say. A few summers ago I was doing work with the Boys & Girls club and there was this huge scandal because this girl (11) said one of the counselors was being inappropriate but once we got a hold of the phone and it was investigated she stole his number from the office and stated sending him vivid sexual text which went unanswered. She got so mad that he didn?t want her trash ass to suck his dick she lied on him. These girls are fast and nasty asf. The Brother is disgusting trash and needs to pay but they need to find out why is she a slut as well at an early age.

hhhhhhhhhhybbybtbynynhnhnngnhnhnhnyhnnh

[GLOCK]

i'm so done @ "the fact that she was willing to go into graphic detail" well, what would you propose she do, Ray? Sugarcoat the fact that this beast ejaculated in her mouth? Maybe a charades mess? Why does it always come back to her being somewhere at fault with you?

not her doing an interpretive dance

ddddddddddddddddddd

I just canceled my gospel tour mess after admitting i voted for trump

[GLOCK]

not she enjoyed it

im really shaking in hea

Kings what are u guys doing?

[RAY7]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

[Barbie Dangerous]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

[GLOCK]

Yeah y?all are craze. Sex is a pleasure able act so it?s not far fetched to think she would enjoy it. I just don?t see the point of mentioning it as if it?s less of a disgusting act in Jelanis behalf? And I?m still not getting why ppl keep assuming this is some fast 11 year old.

yeah
If someone could please highlight where Lil sis was hoeing ?
And even still.. she?s 11.. she has NO POWER..

[GLOCK]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

whew!

Common sense really ain?t that common

[RAY7]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

who would know if she really went completely into detail or not though? If she left out certain things and just said ?that?s all?
No one would dispute it, saying they did more
THINK about it babe

[Barbie Dangerous]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

who would know if she really went completely into detail or not though? If she left out certain things and just said ?that?s all?
No one would dispute it, saying they did more
THINK about it babe

You don't just take the stand and go on a tangent without deeper questions, interception, and/or objections. Do you think a judge would just allow a minor to talk about her sexual encounters if it had no relevancy to the case?

[FlowerBomb]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

who would know if she really went completely into detail or not though? If she left out certain things and just said ?that?s all?
No one would dispute it, saying they did more
THINK about it babe

You don't just take the stand and go on a tangent without deeper questions, interception, and/or objections. Do you think a judge would just allow a minor to talk about her sexual encounters if it had no relevancy to the case?

omg 
ray stfu 

[RAY7]

Well I?m gonna answer
First of all, she?s not ?at fault? with me EVER
Second, I would EXPECT a child who was molested to maybe be nervous, afraid, distraught etc as they go into detail about a traumatic experience
and this moral police BS in here is hilarious from you Rome
who has definitely laughed at the jokes about kids DYING
so bye nigga

well, it?s a transcript. Those don?t typically give you a peek into how someone sounds or emotions they?re going through.

no, it?s a report from a newspaper
usually they describe everything, but taking out the ?emotions?
just the info, I would expect her to not give all the details like that
unless the judge demanded it. All we needed to know was that there was sexual activity, not exactly what kind

v


Hun, you're always required to go into full detail in order for the judge and jury to get a better understanding of the crime. And her details were drawn out by questions via the prosecution I'm sure..

who would know if she really went completely into detail or not though? If she left out certain things and just said ?that?s all?
No one would dispute it, saying they did more
THINK about it babe

You don't just take the stand and go on a tangent without deeper questions, interception, and/or objections. Do you think a judge would just allow a minor to talk about her sexual encounters if it had no relevancy to the case?

you?re not taking what?s being said into context
Will there be questions and objections? Of course
What those questions and objections would be is the question
I?m sure her lawyers aren?t gonna say ?don?t forget that he hit it from the back!? ?Came in your mouth!? When they already have more than enough of a case just with her saying he penetrated her once
and of course Jelani?s defense lawyers wouldn?t bring that up either if they are trying to clear his name
Like are you just trying to argue with me or are you actually THINKING