Quote from: Redskin on August 02, 2018, 04:23:58 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 04:22:49 PM
This isn't based on sales.
This is based on chart position points of each artist's career.
So a 500,000 selling song (spending 10 weeks at #1) could be higher than a 1,000,000 selling song (spending 1 week at #1).
Actual sales >>

Wow
So what you're saying is, either way NIcki planked on all deez hoes
Including Pissy?
I'm saying I prefer hard sales list.
Not inverse point systems... which Billboard uses, cause prior to 1991, there was no soundscan system to REALLY know how much people sold. So they do 100 points for #1, 99 points for #2, and so forth.
It's misleading.
An album peaking at #1 for 5 weeks... but selling 1 million could be positioned higher than an album peaking at #25 and selling 4 million. Obviously the 4 million album did better in actual sales. But Billboard is using the points system to structure the chart. So I don't think it holds much weight.