Why Janet Jackson Outranks Michael Among the Top 100 Artists of All Time

Started by Lazarus, August 02, 2018, 04:53:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.




Lazarus

Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1

Rxxf

Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1

Yes, including 11-100.
BRANDY

MelMel

Mays got dragged in here and I would like for this to keep happening all the time guys

FlowerBomb

Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1
literally
QuoteBut the more weeks an artist spends in the chart?s upper echelons, the better his or her all-time tally, and Janet has racked up 219 weeks in the top 10 compared with Michael?s 183. Between the two, Janet has also spent the most time at No. 1 with any single: ?That?s the Way Love Goes? ruled for eight weeks in 1993, topping the career-best seven-week reigns of Michael?s ?Billie Jean? in 1983 and ?Black or White? in 1991 and 1992.


:omf: :omf:

Rxxf

Quote from: MelMel on August 02, 2018, 05:09:43 PM
Mays got dragged in here and I would like for this to keep happening all the time guys


This episode
:kii:
BRANDY

Lazarus

Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:09:29 PM
Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1

Yes, including 11-100.


It didn't say anything about those positions on the Hot 100 but ok

Rxxf

Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:12:26 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:09:29 PM
Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1

Yes, including 11-100.


It didn't say anything about those positions on the Hot 100 but ok

They didn't have to.
It's an inverse system. #1 gets 100 points, #100 gets 1 point. And they calculate based on that.

This wasn't about you, tho, with all due respect. I wasn't coming at YOU. I feel like you think I was? Lol.
:dead:

The way they calculate from 1-100 is on their website.
BRANDY


Lazarus

Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:14:11 PM
Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:12:26 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:09:29 PM
Quote from: Lazarus on August 02, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
Quote from: Rxxf on August 02, 2018, 05:06:06 PM
No.

Oh ok because what I took from this was that they tally up each artist's week spent in the Top 10 and at No.1

Yes, including 11-100.


It didn't say anything about those positions on the Hot 100 but ok

They didn't have to.
It's an inverse system. #1 gets 100 points, #100 gets 1 point. And they calculate based on that.

This wasn't about you, tho, with all due respect. I wasn't coming at YOU. I feel like you think I was? Lol.
:dead:

The way they calculate from 1-100 is on their website.

Ralf, I get it and I'm familiar with Billboard's standards/point system. No I don't think you're coming for me. We're just having a discussion.

What I'm saying is, it seems like Billboard negate all the other positions on the Hot 100 and only counted when the artist entered the Top 10 or debut at No.1 and counted the multiple weeks the artist and their song spent inside the Top 10 or at No.1.