Home

[Sinpool]

Glock bby you also forgot the part where in the documentary one of the girls parents did a mission impossible mess and saved her daughter for R. Kelly's grasps.

R. Kelly had pounds and pounds of visible evidence only a fool could deny.

[Young]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/i-dont-believe-michael-jacksons-accusers-in-leaving-neverland
They summed it up for me tbh

Welp.

[Kalifornia.]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/i-dont-believe-michael-jacksons-accusers-in-leaving-neverland
They summed it up for me tbh

!!!!

Both men had also in the past stated under oath that Jackson never behaved inappropriately. Safechuck made his statement when he was still a child during the 1993 sexual abuse trial against Jackson, which was ultimately settled out of court.

But Robson's situation is even more bizarre. He, like Safechuck, said in 1993 that he was never abused by Jackson. He was a child then as well but even as an adult, he testified a second time that there was no misconduct. In the 2005 trial against Jackson, again, for sexual abuse, Robson was in his early 20s. Under oath, and presumably sitting before a plaintiff who had accused Jackson of sexual abuse, he again said that that Jackson had not molested him.

You can imagine that a child, in shame and fear, would refuse to admit he had been inappropriately fondled. It's even reasonable to imagine adults keeping silent out of the same fear or shame. But why would he go to the length of testifying falsely on Jackson's behalf in court, under oath, and then continue to maintain that position right up until it was too late to make a real difference?

From the 2005 court transcript:

Counsel: "Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever molest you at any time?"
Robson: "Absolutely not."
Counsel: "Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?"
Robson: "Never, no."

[Young]

Yeah girls can't really explain why they refuse to accept this view of MJ..
shame the berts but they are no different
Blacks as a whole don't want to accept the folks they grew up adoring as monsters

its  ain't right

n

boy no.

You're just ready to jump under any piece of media manipulation thrown out to the public it seems

You cant claim to know slavery is still very real in a systematic sense, know that MJ's charges were DROPPED WHILE he was a alive and here to defend himself; and then wanna run and play devil's advocate for these white liars.

No

first off watch wtf you say..

I stopped here.

NO.
I say what the fuck I WANT

[GLOCK]

Yeah girls can't really explain why they refuse to accept this view of MJ..
shame the berts but they are no different
Blacks as a whole don't want to accept the folks they grew up adoring as monsters

its  ain't right

n

boy no.

You're just ready to jump under any piece of media manipulation thrown out to the public it seems

You cant claim to know slavery is still very real in a systematic sense, know that MJ's charges were DROPPED WHILE he was a alive and here to defend himself; and then wanna run and play devil's advocate for these white liars.

No

first off watch wtf you say..

I stopped here.

NO.
I say what the fuck I WANT

And you'll get fucking read accordingly

[FlowerBomb]

and why NOW?
Did they see how much traction the Rkelly mess was getting and wanted in on the coin too?
Wonder how Janet feels about Oprah after this too.

[Young]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/i-dont-believe-michael-jacksons-accusers-in-leaving-neverland
They summed it up for me tbh

!!!!

Both men had also in the past stated under oath that Jackson never behaved inappropriately. Safechuck made his statement when he was still a child during the 1993 sexual abuse trial against Jackson, which was ultimately settled out of court.

But Robson's situation is even more bizarre. He, like Safechuck, said in 1993 that he was never abused by Jackson. He was a child then as well but even as an adult, he testified a second time that there was no misconduct. In the 2005 trial against Jackson, again, for sexual abuse, Robson was in his early 20s. Under oath, and presumably sitting before a plaintiff who had accused Jackson of sexual abuse, he again said that that Jackson had not molested him.

You can imagine that a child, in shame and fear, would refuse to admit he had been inappropriately fondled. It's even reasonable to imagine adults keeping silent out of the same fear or shame. But why would he go to the length of testifying falsely on Jackson's behalf in court, under oath, and then continue to maintain that position right up until it was too late to make a real difference?

From the 2005 court transcript:

Counsel: "Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever molest you at any time?"
Robson: "Absolutely not."
Counsel: "Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?"
Robson: "Never, no."

PERIOD.

Glock you wanna play devil's advocate today and that's okay!

But it is what it is m'luv

[Young]

Yeah girls can't really explain why they refuse to accept this view of MJ..
shame the berts but they are no different
Blacks as a whole don't want to accept the folks they grew up adoring as monsters

its  ain't right

n

boy no.

You're just ready to jump under any piece of media manipulation thrown out to the public it seems

You cant claim to know slavery is still very real in a systematic sense, know that MJ's charges were DROPPED WHILE he was a alive and here to defend himself; and then wanna run and play devil's advocate for these white liars.

No

first off watch wtf you say..

I stopped here.

NO.
I say what the fuck I WANT

And you'll get fucking read accordingly

n

oh okay!

[GLOCK]

Faggot I'm not playing devils advocate 
you wanna play stupid.. I have time 

[GLOCK]

Yeah girls can't really explain why they refuse to accept this view of MJ..
shame the berts but they are no different
Blacks as a whole don't want to accept the folks they grew up adoring as monsters

its  ain't right

n

boy no.

You're just ready to jump under any piece of media manipulation thrown out to the public it seems

You cant claim to know slavery is still very real in a systematic sense, know that MJ's charges were DROPPED WHILE he was a alive and here to defend himself; and then wanna run and play devil's advocate for these white liars.

No

first off watch wtf you say..

I stopped here.

NO.
I say what the fuck I WANT

And you'll get fucking read accordingly

n

oh okay!

yeah

[Young]

Did you miss this?

I'll quote it again.

This is my stance.

Bert and this case are NOT one in the same for one.
and TWO, you  can literally go back into my posts since you have time to see where I said I never watched the Bert special and don't wanna say much on it.

me joking and kii'ing and dragging Bert about the pedo mess is no different than the mon murder jokes.

So actually, its you playing for convenience.

[FlowerBomb]

Corey Feldman defends Michael Jackson
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/05/entertainment/corey-feldman-michael-jackson/index.html
and this guys is like the most vocal person about pedophilia in the industry 

Why has no one said anything about one of the older accusers saying he was circumcised when his autopsy revealed MJ was uncut?

[❄️☃️🌨� Shuji Feels Different 🌨�☃️❄️]

I definitely believe some of the allegations against Michael, but there's little to no proof to validate those claims. With Rape.Kelly the evidence is much more clear-cut, including video of him fucking downe. Chile. It's easy to see the distinctions in the cases.

[GLOCK]

Yeah this girl above me (young) doesn't fucking care about blacks and never have
the only time u catch her in a thread discussing race is when it impacts the people she likes

and that's that on that.

[FlowerBomb]

We're in the outrage and cancel! era, and Oprah wants to cash in on that