Boosie: "Get these faggots off of TV"

Started by Phantom, November 23, 2015, 12:33:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

L0NZ.

Quote from: Lion Babe on November 23, 2015, 07:43:32 PM
d

it feels like you all agree on the same thing

ya just fighting over the term "gay agenda" 

:udontlookok:



Miranda

Quote from: Mack on November 23, 2015, 07:39:22 PM
A: The word "gay agenda" is fine. Gays are actively being pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
young, ralf
B: The word "gay agenda" is problematic. Gays are actively being pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
Lonz, Phantom, PCJ, Mack
C: The word "gay agenda" is problematic. Gays are not being actively pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
Drais, Supreme, Talisa
D: The word "gay agenda" is fine. Gays are being actively pushed on TV. We do not enjoy gays on TV.
iman

So yeah here is the breakdown. Don't know where animmai and letters stand just yet. Animmai seems to be between B and C, from what I have seen.



Drais sis, where do you place yourself? All the other gorls are kinda COMFY in their category mess, except you.

Where do you stand?


Young

Quote from: Mack on November 23, 2015, 07:45:32 PM
Quote from: Lion Babe on November 23, 2015, 07:43:32 PM
d

it feels like you all agree on the same thing

ya just fighting over the term "gay agenda" 

:udontlookok:

yeah drais blue font all up in rage about a damn word.

He disagreed with me claiming he believed that gays are not actively being pushed, so does that mean he does believe in it, but wants to call it something else?

He literally makes no sense. Is he arguing because it happens slowly, it is not a push?

Drais sis, are gays actively being normalized by TV makers or not?


SUPREME

Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:45:34 PM
Quote from: SUPREME on November 23, 2015, 07:42:28 PM
Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:40:02 PM
Quote from: SUPREME on November 23, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Quote from: ANIMMAI on November 23, 2015, 07:35:04 PM
Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:30:09 PM
Quote from: ANIMMAI on November 23, 2015, 07:27:14 PM
Lonz basically reiterated what we've been saying about the negative connotations behind the phrase

"haha whoops!"

sit down :dead:

Gorl I SAID there was an agenda which is what he said

I said I won't use the term agenda because it ruffles the feathers of many, but I don't feel it's a bad thing.

I mean....yes, WHOOPS

What he said was true.

You keep saying you don't view it as a negative thing but ur condescending "n" posts made it seem like you felt there was some sort of corruption being done.

I really can't tell if you genuinely see it as a bad thing or think that saying it makes you look more informed than everyone else.
!!

That's why I made that comment about how he was a few months ago

THERE'S AN AGENDA GUYS LOL. SAD THAT YOU CAN'T SEE IT. LMAO!

But now we've changed and you've done a 180?

Not buying it.

Gorl wtf are u talking about.
You always come in a thread late not saying nothing but quick to try and call someone out. Wtf is GEWD hun
I already addressed it.

You constantly make stances that you either can't explain fully or you go BACK on later

And you're offensive as Fuck, whether you realize it or not.

But it's nothing personal, I just need you know when you Fuck up.

What did I say that you need further explanation on Hun?
n

Half your posts hun

:udontlookok:

But I don't get angry or anything because I think you're genuinely good person, sometimes.




Rxxf

BRANDY

LOONA.

Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Drais. on November 23, 2015, 07:40:15 PM
Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:36:28 PM
Quote from: Drais. on November 23, 2015, 07:32:35 PM
h

"oh! consider feelings!"

Gur you stopped using the term because it conflicts with your views, which is what we tried telling you.

You seem think there's a sudden rush of gays now when the media has slowly been including them and feeding them to the masses over a long period of time now.

But a Gay agenda mess to you too.   


Gorl I still stick TO the term gay agenda.
Because u gorls aren't comfortable with it and for the sake of argument I just started saying push,

Regardless the meaning in the same. The media has devised a plan to push LGBT into normality.

Point. Blank. Period.

The shit isn't happening by osmosis?

f

This "plan" has been going on for decades. Homosexuality has been featured in movies, music, tvs, news etc etc. There is just MORE of it now that LGBT are slowly becoming more accepted. A UFO full of faggots didn't just fall out the sky in one day.

That's why the gurs aren't seeing this "agenda" mess because this has been going on for quite some time now.

Dummy   


Monkey if it's happening now at a larger rate than before it doesn't change the fact that there's an agenda just like YOU fucking acknowledged. Hun wake up.
Whether it's been going on for some time or not u still agreed in essence

I never acknowledged there was an agenda, you wannabe caucasian fag. I used the quotation marks for a reason. You three stooges keep hooping and hollering about some push from the media like we went from homosexuality being taboo to it becoming accepted and mainstream overnight.

MORE of the same thing isn't an agenda nor is it being forced and shoved down your throats to accept the "lifestyle"

   

Young

I'm crying

Now the gorls wanna acknowledge there was a motive but now at a slower rate.

But I'm contradicting?Sdddddddd

My stance never changed just the word I used


Rxxf

Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:46:59 PM
Quote from: Mack on November 23, 2015, 07:45:32 PM
Quote from: Lion Babe on November 23, 2015, 07:43:32 PM
d

it feels like you all agree on the same thing

ya just fighting over the term "gay agenda" 

:udontlookok:

yeah drais blue font all up in rage about a damn word.

He disagreed with me claiming he believed that gays are not actively being pushed, so does that mean he does believe in it, but wants to call it something else?

He literally makes no sense. Is he arguing because it happens slowly, it is not a push?

Drais sis, are gays actively being normalized by TV makers or not?

And it's deeper than just TV executives.
BRANDY

SUPREME

But I'm not trying to call you out or anything

So I apologize if it feels that way, young

I don't really do the passive aggressive thing when I dislike someone. I just say fck you.

:udontlookok:

Rxxf

Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:48:12 PM
I'm crying

Now the gorls wanna acknowledge there was a motive but now at a slower rate.

But I'm contradicting?Sdddddddd

My stance never changed just the word I used

Young.
:kii:
BRANDY

Rxxf

Quote from: Drais. on November 23, 2015, 07:48:00 PM
Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Drais. on November 23, 2015, 07:40:15 PM
Quote from: Young on November 23, 2015, 07:36:28 PM
Quote from: Drais. on November 23, 2015, 07:32:35 PM
h

"oh! consider feelings!"

Gur you stopped using the term because it conflicts with your views, which is what we tried telling you.

You seem think there's a sudden rush of gays now when the media has slowly been including them and feeding them to the masses over a long period of time now.

But a Gay agenda mess to you too.   


Gorl I still stick TO the term gay agenda.
Because u gorls aren't comfortable with it and for the sake of argument I just started saying push,

Regardless the meaning in the same. The media has devised a plan to push LGBT into normality.

Point. Blank. Period.

The shit isn't happening by osmosis?

f

This "plan" has been going on for decades. Homosexuality has been featured in movies, music, tvs, news etc etc. There is just MORE of it now that LGBT are slowly becoming more accepted. A UFO full of faggots didn't just fall out the sky in one day.

That's why the gurs aren't seeing this "agenda" mess because this has been going on for quite some time now.

Dummy   


Monkey if it's happening now at a larger rate than before it doesn't change the fact that there's an agenda just like YOU fucking acknowledged. Hun wake up.
Whether it's been going on for some time or not u still agreed in essence

I never acknowledged there was an agenda, you wannabe caucasian fag. I used the quotation marks for a reason. You three stooges keep hooping and hollering about some push from the media like we went from homosexuality being taboo to it becoming accepted and mainstream overnight.

MORE of the same thing isn't an agenda nor is it being forced and shoved down your throats to accept the "lifestyle"

   


I never said "overnight". That's impossible.

But something can be done in massive amounts. Which is happening now.
BRANDY

Phantom

s

I told yall 20 pages ago that no one disagreed that the visibility of gays in the media had increased

Miranda

Drais just answer the damn questions, show your true colors. What is your damn stance?

Nobody was speaking about over night or any of that mess.

We know that you enjoy gays on TV, therefore disagreeing with iman. We know that you dislike the term "gay agenda", what you have not been able to make clear however is the following:

Are gays actively being normalized by TV makers or not? It is simple. Yes or No.

Rxxf

Quote from: Mack on November 23, 2015, 07:46:52 PM
Quote from: Mack on November 23, 2015, 07:39:22 PM
A: The word "gay agenda" is fine. Gays are actively being pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
young, ralf
B: The word "gay agenda" is problematic. Gays are actively being pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
Lonz, Phantom, PCJ, Mack
C: The word "gay agenda" is problematic. Gays are not being actively pushed on TV. We enjoy gays on TV.
Drais, Supreme, Talisa
D: The word "gay agenda" is fine. Gays are being actively pushed on TV. We do not enjoy gays on TV.
iman

So yeah here is the breakdown. Don't know where animmai and letters stand just yet. Animmai seems to be between B and C, from what I have seen.



Drais sis, where do you place yourself? All the other gorls are kinda COMFY in their category mess, except you.

Where do you stand?



You are something else, my love.
:dead:
BRANDY