Home

[RAY7]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? Were they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

[stillpretty]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? We're they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

you're kinda doing the reverse of what everyone else was doing

they were making it solely about chris and him being attacked and targeted

ur kinda making it about michael being attacked and targeted

it is BOTH of them. it is CHRIS doing a tribute to MICHAEL. it is their COMBINED histories that make for what could be a super uncomfortable segment of the show.

i personally blame the AMA producers for not getting full clearance and approval from Disney/ABC in ADVANCE before putting Chris through all those rehearsals and mess.

like, how could they NOT see this coming. ABC/Disney is doing what's best for their brand/image. They (ABC/Disney) even tried to work it out with Chris with alternative plans for him to perform/promote something else but Chris said he wasn't showing up at all if he wasn't doing the tribute. Which is understandable considering all the work he put in for that tribute specifically. He was pissed.

AMA is at fault.
I'd like to know which idiot thought putting something like this together without notifying DISNEY execs first would end well or be fruitful.

[RAY7]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? We're they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

you're kinda doing the reverse of what everyone else was doing

they were making it solely about chris and him being attacked and targeted

ur kinda making it about michael being attacked and targeted

it is BOTH of them. it is CHRIS doing a tribute to MICHAEL. it is their COMBINED histories that make for what could be a super uncomfortable segment of the show.

i personally blame the AMA producers for not getting full clearance and approval from Disney/ABC in ADVANCE before putting Chris through all those rehearsals and mess.

like, how could they NOT see this coming. ABC/Disney is doing what's best for their brand/image. They (ABC/Disney) even tried to work it out with Chris with alternative plans for him to perform/promote something else but Chris said he wasn't showing up at all if he wasn't doing the tribute. Which is understandable considering all the work he put in for that tribute specifically. He was pissed.

AMA is at fault.

for me though at least Chris has a CONFIRMED history speak of and Michael does not. You can't put that together. That's basically saying regardless if you're innocent or not, you get punished because you were accused. Anybody can accuse anyone of anything, with or without evidence and in the blink of an eye any of us can be ALLEGED anything. That's not right. Those execs were wrong and them ratings were LOW as expected

[stillpretty]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? We're they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

you're kinda doing the reverse of what everyone else was doing

they were making it solely about chris and him being attacked and targeted

ur kinda making it about michael being attacked and targeted

it is BOTH of them. it is CHRIS doing a tribute to MICHAEL. it is their COMBINED histories that make for what could be a super uncomfortable segment of the show.

i personally blame the AMA producers for not getting full clearance and approval from Disney/ABC in ADVANCE before putting Chris through all those rehearsals and mess.

like, how could they NOT see this coming. ABC/Disney is doing what's best for their brand/image. They (ABC/Disney) even tried to work it out with Chris with alternative plans for him to perform/promote something else but Chris said he wasn't showing up at all if he wasn't doing the tribute. Which is understandable considering all the work he put in for that tribute specifically. He was pissed.

AMA is at fault.

for me though at least Chris has a CONFIRMED history speak of and Michael does not. You can't put that together. That's basically saying regardless if you're innocent or not, you get punished because you were accused. Anybody can accuse anyone of anything, with or without evidence and in the blink of an eye any of us can be ALLEGED anything. That's not right. Those execs were wrong and them ratings were LOW as expected

again, this comes back to PERCEPTION, and its power which u keep dismissing lol.

yes Ray that's how the world works unfortunately.

if someone accuses their teacher of sexually assaulting them, and it makes headlines everywhere

whether the teacher actually did it or not...the damage to their reputation is done.

this is just reality. and Disney/ABC is a business. they must be tapped into reality in order to make and keep their money.

unfortunately the real world doesn't operate like a fairytale with gum drops flowing and everyone getting the benefit of the doubt.

in the real world, if people THINK you're a child molester...you're a child molester.
ever heard of the phrase "perception is reality"? it is 1000% applicable in this case.

so even if mike never laid one finger on a child before, he might as well have if enough people THINK he did.

so u now combine mike's reality with chris's reality and u get an explosion of mess. problematic overload.
all with a common theme of mistreatment and abuse of other human beings

is this making sense now?

[RAY7]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? We're they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

you're kinda doing the reverse of what everyone else was doing

they were making it solely about chris and him being attacked and targeted

ur kinda making it about michael being attacked and targeted

it is BOTH of them. it is CHRIS doing a tribute to MICHAEL. it is their COMBINED histories that make for what could be a super uncomfortable segment of the show.

i personally blame the AMA producers for not getting full clearance and approval from Disney/ABC in ADVANCE before putting Chris through all those rehearsals and mess.

like, how could they NOT see this coming. ABC/Disney is doing what's best for their brand/image. They (ABC/Disney) even tried to work it out with Chris with alternative plans for him to perform/promote something else but Chris said he wasn't showing up at all if he wasn't doing the tribute. Which is understandable considering all the work he put in for that tribute specifically. He was pissed.

AMA is at fault.

for me though at least Chris has a CONFIRMED history speak of and Michael does not. You can't put that together. That's basically saying regardless if you're innocent or not, you get punished because you were accused. Anybody can accuse anyone of anything, with or without evidence and in the blink of an eye any of us can be ALLEGED anything. That's not right. Those execs were wrong and them ratings were LOW as expected

again, this comes back to PERCEPTION, and its power which u keep dismissing lol.

yes Ray that's how the world works unfortunately.

if someone accuses their teacher of sexually assaulting them, and it makes headlines everywhere

whether the teacher actually did it or not...the damage to their reputation is done.

this is just reality. and Disney/ABC is a business. they must be tapped into reality in order to make and keep their money.

unfortunately the real world doesn't operate like a fairytale with gum drops flowing and everyone getting the benefit of the doubt.

in the real world, if people THINK you're a child molester...you're a child molester.
ever heard of the phrase "perception is reality"? it is 1000% applicable in this case.

so even if mike never laid one finger on a child before, he might as well have if enough people THINK he did.

is this making sense now?

what you're saying is true I'm just mad about it. There needs to be a change because that's problematic. Ppl can't get on with their lives when they're falsely accused of something? Even when they're dead and can't even defend themselves?

[stillpretty]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? We're they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

you're kinda doing the reverse of what everyone else was doing

they were making it solely about chris and him being attacked and targeted

ur kinda making it about michael being attacked and targeted

it is BOTH of them. it is CHRIS doing a tribute to MICHAEL. it is their COMBINED histories that make for what could be a super uncomfortable segment of the show.

i personally blame the AMA producers for not getting full clearance and approval from Disney/ABC in ADVANCE before putting Chris through all those rehearsals and mess.

like, how could they NOT see this coming. ABC/Disney is doing what's best for their brand/image. They (ABC/Disney) even tried to work it out with Chris with alternative plans for him to perform/promote something else but Chris said he wasn't showing up at all if he wasn't doing the tribute. Which is understandable considering all the work he put in for that tribute specifically. He was pissed.

AMA is at fault.

for me though at least Chris has a CONFIRMED history speak of and Michael does not. You can't put that together. That's basically saying regardless if you're innocent or not, you get punished because you were accused. Anybody can accuse anyone of anything, with or without evidence and in the blink of an eye any of us can be ALLEGED anything. That's not right. Those execs were wrong and them ratings were LOW as expected

again, this comes back to PERCEPTION, and its power which u keep dismissing lol.

yes Ray that's how the world works unfortunately.

if someone accuses their teacher of sexually assaulting them, and it makes headlines everywhere

whether the teacher actually did it or not...the damage to their reputation is done.

this is just reality. and Disney/ABC is a business. they must be tapped into reality in order to make and keep their money.

unfortunately the real world doesn't operate like a fairytale with gum drops flowing and everyone getting the benefit of the doubt.

in the real world, if people THINK you're a child molester...you're a child molester.
ever heard of the phrase "perception is reality"? it is 1000% applicable in this case.

so even if mike never laid one finger on a child before, he might as well have if enough people THINK he did.

is this making sense now?

what you're saying is true I'm just mad about it. There needs to be a change because that's problematic. Ppl can't get on with their lives when they're falsely accused of something? Even when they're dead and can't even defend themselves?

it sucks but i mean "life isn't fair" and mess i guess.

unfortunately mike's apparent infatuation with children and desire to be around them so much put him in a position for accusations that, whether true or not, seemed believable enough.

talking about sharing his bed with kids , having sleepovers.....

i want to believe that michael was so genuinely innocent and naive that he didn't even see the "issue" with saying all of that stuff and putting himself in those situations.... and how it could be perceived and ultimately used against him

but i honestly don't know.

[Ｂｏｏｍｚ]

Boy stfu

I'm screaming

[Ｂｏｏｍｚ]

Bow is such a white lady


"Wow, I remember it very differently... "

[Barbie Dangerous]

https://twitter.com/buzzingpop/status/1594886940020686851

[Kalifornia.]

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? Were they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

This is really stupid honestly if Michael being an alleged molester was an issue
Why even plan a tribute to him in the first place? So it would be cool if an innocent person tributed a molester?
Forget Chris this is really disrespectful to Michael. He went to TWO trials and was found not guilty both times. How can you treat a person like they're guilty or possibly guilty just because they're accused of something? Basically it's saying that the verdict means nothing
 

it's really not about michael actually being a molester. he's an alleged molester.
one who beat a couple of cases and settled others. but was never found guilty.

however, ya'll are really dismissing the power of PERCEPTION

OJ was found not guilty in the court of law but that did not change what the gorls felt about him and what they knew in their hearts to be true.

people watching TV won't think "oh i thought mike touched those kids but he beat those cases in court and settled the others so he's good in my book ! LMAO! long as theres no guilty verdict!"

even if those execs think that michael AND chris did nothing worth canceling the show for
this is ultimately a business  and they have to consider what their viewers will think of what's on their screens.

it's just too much. woman beater pays tribute to alleged child molester.
that's not what you may see but you have to think further than yourself a bit to understand why this decision was made.

which still leads to my point, why even put together a tribute in the first place for this person who ppl watching might have issues with? Were they gonna be fine if it was Usher doing the tribute to an ALLEGED molester because he's never been on trial for anything? It's just not making sense.
Also, what else can a person do when they are acquitted of crimes? You're just gonna be ALLEGED for the stuff you already were cleared of FOREVER? This man has been dead for 13 years and still technically being punished for something that no one can prove to be true. Like come ON

He should've been on trial for that lil boy drowning in his pool.

 

[Kalifornia.]

https://twitter.com/buzzingpop/status/1594886940020686851

It's not like they would've been any different if he performed

[Nine]

https://twitter.com/buzzingpop/status/1594886940020686851

It's not like they would've been any different if he performed

ddsdssdsddsdsdsds !!!!!

He's not a ratings draw by ANY means

 

[Barbie Dangerous]

https://twitter.com/buzzingpop/status/1594886940020686851

It's not like they would've been any different if he performed

You don't know this.

[Barbie Dangerous]

Bow is such a white lady


"Wow, I remember it very differently... "

ncnncncnggoth GB b