after reading what they're looking at it makes just a lil more sense.
this preface...they KNEW. sfnsfnfsnsfnfsnsfnfs
i checked for an explanation because im like it's no way they're looking into singing technicalities like control and range , etc.
QuoteBefore you start scrolling (and commenting), keep in mind that this is the Greatest Singers list, not the Greatest Voices List. Talent is impressive; genius is transcendent. Sure, many of the people here were born with massive pipes, perfect pitch, and boundless range. Others have rougher, stranger, or more delicate instruments. As our write-up for the man who ended up at Number 112 notes, "Ozzy Osbourne doesn't have what most people would call a good voice, but boy does he have a great one." That could apply to more than a few people here. and when ur talking about the "best singers"
i was about to say what the FUCK. why did they get it THIS wrong if we're talking about things in singing that can actually be measured and that are more technical?
