Started by ChillOut, March 14, 2017, 01:32:27 PM
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:28:42 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:26:33 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:25:24 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company wow. Isnt this that chick you GO UP for Glock? looks like she's on the winning teamam not familiar ...cute girl tholemme help you outhttp://www.brandysource.net/index.php?topic=10349.msg284524#msg284524
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:26:33 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:25:24 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company wow. Isnt this that chick you GO UP for Glock? looks like she's on the winning teamam not familiar ...cute girl tho
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:25:24 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company wow. Isnt this that chick you GO UP for Glock? looks like she's on the winning team
Quote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company
View this post on Instagram
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:29:00 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:24:12 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:18:55 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving What's the difference?And the other post I quoted you said the same thing. Thrive means that is flourishing, its on par with Nike and Adidas in sales, when it was not. Until a company is discontinued, it's thriving in my eyes.bottom line, Rih wasn't the only gorl to give Puma a boost. There are zillions of celebs attached to the Puma, like Drais said. It's a STUPID comparison.
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:24:12 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:18:55 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving What's the difference?And the other post I quoted you said the same thing. Thrive means that is flourishing, its on par with Nike and Adidas in sales, when it was not.
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:18:55 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving What's the difference?And the other post I quoted you said the same thing.
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving.
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:30:02 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:23:50 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:22:04 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago. LOGICone of the few things u were born without tbhThat thing kills me trying to stroll into threads and give RATIONALE. Bitch, ur a hater and until u can overcome that, most of what u say wont hold any weight
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:23:50 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:22:04 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago. LOGICone of the few things u were born without tbh
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:22:04 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago. LOGIC
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago.
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence..
Quote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:31:47 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!you are in here doing the most hun.
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!
Quote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on March 14, 2017, 03:31:40 PMWhere's Ciara
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:17:11 PMI only see Z listers wearing Ivy Park. Monica and Zeyanda are the only ones.
Quote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on March 14, 2017, 03:31:40 PMWhere's Ciara's line guys? Asking for a friend.
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:32:55 PMhttps://www.popsugar.com/fashion/Janet-Jackson-Launches-Lingerie-Line-Called-Pleasure-Principle-1879803Does anyone have UPDATES on jans lingerie line?
Quote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:28:34 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:27:22 PMQuote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:26:09 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!What percentage of Puma does Rih own?the direction FP is headed...they may offer her the entire 'panySo her name is
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:27:22 PMQuote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:26:09 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!What percentage of Puma does Rih own?the direction FP is headed...they may offer her the entire 'pany
Quote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:26:09 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!What percentage of Puma does Rih own?
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:32:00 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:28:42 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:26:33 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:25:24 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company wow. Isnt this that chick you GO UP for Glock? looks like she's on the winning teamam not familiar ...cute girl tholemme help you outhttp://www.brandysource.net/index.php?topic=10349.msg284524#msg284524BABE.. not sure if u clicked the link before sending it!!but thank u!always loved that PIC of my girl
