Started by ChillOut, March 14, 2017, 01:32:27 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:21:45 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:19:44 PMTHESE GORLS in here arguing semanticsddddddddddIVY PARK was no stand alone company..and thats fucking THAT..google it or look at thisU have me CRYING
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:19:44 PMTHESE GORLS in here arguing semanticsddddddddddIVY PARK was no stand alone company..and thats fucking THAT..google it or look at this
View this post on Instagram
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:10:50 PMQuote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:09:56 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:08:33 PMSo yeah.. ivy park is not some stand alone company LMAO therefore killing this "self made" narrative!Ack!Park wood is perched all over it.LMAO yeah so is TOPSHOP haha Whew! This business gang bang! Love it ❤️
Quote from: BowDown on March 14, 2017, 03:09:56 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:08:33 PMSo yeah.. ivy park is not some stand alone company LMAO therefore killing this "self made" narrative!Ack!Park wood is perched all over it.
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:08:33 PMSo yeah.. ivy park is not some stand alone company LMAO therefore killing this "self made" narrative!Ack!
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:18:59 PMSo in conclusion, no one is wearing ivy park. Hopefully it doesn't end up like Dereon
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:20:29 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:10:57 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:08:03 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:05:45 PMIs this supposed to mean something? We can post pics of celebs in Fenty as well. The question was is the general public rockin the messwhy so combative? I haven't said 1 negative thing about rih's line in here.Im answering the OP.. as she claims nobody is wearing it.right, the question was is ANYONE wearing the brand and clearly there are lots of people wearing. Not sure where the "general public" came into play, but that's vonc; he's a bit slow.
Quote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:10:57 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:08:03 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:05:45 PMIs this supposed to mean something? We can post pics of celebs in Fenty as well. The question was is the general public rockin the messwhy so combative? I haven't said 1 negative thing about rih's line in here.Im answering the OP.. as she claims nobody is wearing it.
Quote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:08:03 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:05:45 PMIs this supposed to mean something? We can post pics of celebs in Fenty as well. The question was is the general public rockin the mess
Quote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:05:45 PM
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 03:22:04 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago. LOGIC
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:12:10 PMQuote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked But Ivy Park wasn't in existence, which is the um, difference?Puma = PumaIvy Park =/= TopshopYou're not making any sense. Rihanna is literally endorsing a shoe. She didn't create a brand new line of footwear or activewear nor did she co-found anything with Puma and she isn't operating her collection under her own production company. She has an endorsement deal. What other celebrities have an athletic brand with Topshop? None. How many celebs have shoes with Puma? A zillion. Big Sean was just announced 2 months ago.
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:02:50 PMQuote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence.. And so was TopshopWtfThis selective logic I'm YELLING Just to see y'all foaming at the mouth has me stoked
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:59 PMAnd whatever Rih is doing with Puma is different from Ivy Park.Puma was already in existence..
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 01:32:27 PMI see Rih's Fenty Puma everywhere, but I have never seen anyone wear that Ivy Park mess.
Quote from: Drais. on March 14, 2017, 03:18:55 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving What's the difference?And the other post I quoted you said the same thing.
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:14:03 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot TF?! No one said it was dead. I said it wasn't thriving
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:11:36 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.r u on drugs? you were basically saying the shit was DEAD..dumb faggot
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:10:19 PMQuote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving. Puma isn?t really considered a major player within the sneaker industry. People definitely wear Pumas, but they can?t touch Nike or Adidas in terms of cultural clout. However, they might be well on their way to changing that with a few well chosen celebrity associations.After naming Rihanna creative director for its women?s line last year, Bloomberg Business is reporting that Puma beat their average fourth quarter financial projections by a whopping $34.5 million. There?s no reason to think Rihanna?s sold out collection of ?Creeper? and ?Eskiva? sneakers weren?t a huge reason for that, and Puma?s CEO agrees. ?She can sell sneakers and Puma is onto something here which we haven?t seen yet in the women?s area,? German company?s CEO Bjorn Gulden state at a press conference.
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.r u dumb? She didnt revive the brand because it was still alive and well. She did give them a nice BOOST. But to say it wasn't thriving.
Quote from: SayMyName on March 14, 2017, 03:03:07 PMQuote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable. Puma wasn't thriving, the moment Rih came on board it saw a huge boost.
Quote from: ShutYourMouth. on March 14, 2017, 02:57:34 PMPuma existed and thrived before Rih and Kylie.Ivy Park is brand new.they are NOT comparable.
Quote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company
Quote from: MΛΥDΛΥ on March 14, 2017, 03:23:14 PMQuote from: Vonc2002 on March 14, 2017, 03:18:59 PMSo in conclusion, no one is wearing ivy park. Hopefully it doesn't end up like DereonPraying tbh
Quote from: GLIZZY on March 14, 2017, 03:24:34 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company LMAO yes at 50%at least one of u girls are SMART enough to understand that IP aint a stand alone companywhew!
Quote from: Baphomet. on March 14, 2017, 03:25:24 PMQuote from: Sleighing Steady on March 14, 2017, 03:23:34 PMthis 50% BLACK owned company wow. Isnt this that chick you GO UP for Glock? looks like she's on the winning team
