Home

[ssw4919]

You can literally sue someone over harmonies. Do you know the meaning of intellectual property? 

Clearly Tamar's version isn't a straight cover of the original, but instead borrows elements from the way whitney sang it.

You zørls just be itching to argue huh 

If that were the case, new writers would have been added to Whitney's version.  So they could be paid.  They were not.  It's the same melody as the original.  You can only sue someone if you're the original writer.   

[GLOCK]

Yeah this is an interpolation 

im sure they got this cleared 
it's a direct melody rip 

[b7]

From a soundtrack? I wonder if she's working on an album 

[Scott.]

n

[reekz]

Wait...True to the Game was so good. I think that's the movie with Columbia Short. Didn't know it was a second one on the way. 

[Scott.]

Yeah this is an interpolation

im sure they got this cleared
it's a direct melody rip

Right.

It's kinda like what Keyshia did with Boyz II Men on Trust & Believe

[🦚]

You can literally sue someone over harmonies. Do you know the meaning of intellectual property? 

Clearly Tamar's version isn't a straight cover of the original, but instead borrows elements from the way whitney sang it.

You zørls just be itching to argue huh 

If that were the case, new writers would have been added to Whitney's version.  So they could be paid.  They were not.  It's the same melody as the original.  You can only sue someone if you're the original writer.   

Why would new writers be added when whitney did the vocal arrangements on her version. If she wanted to be credited as a writer...she could've been. Bit she obviously didn't care.

Stop looking for a moment. You look exhausted

[🦚]

n

You're living a bit huh 

[Young]

n

You're living a bit huh 

ssssssss

[ssw4919]

You can literally sue someone over harmonies. Do you know the meaning of intellectual property? 

Clearly Tamar's version isn't a straight cover of the original, but instead borrows elements from the way whitney sang it.

You zørls just be itching to argue huh 

If that were the case, new writers would have been added to Whitney's version.  So they could be paid.  They were not.  It's the same melody as the original.  You can only sue someone if you're the original writer.   

Why would new writers be added when whitney did the vocal arrangements on her version. If she wanted to be credited as a writer...she could've been. Bit she obviously didn't care.

Stop looking for a moment. You look exhausted

A moment from what?  The point is Pat can say nothing to Tamar about this song.   

[🦚]

You can literally sue someone over harmonies. Do you know the meaning of intellectual property? 

Clearly Tamar's version isn't a straight cover of the original, but instead borrows elements from the way whitney sang it.

You zørls just be itching to argue huh 

If that were the case, new writers would have been added to Whitney's version.  So they could be paid.  They were not.  It's the same melody as the original.  You can only sue someone if you're the original writer.   

Why would new writers be added when whitney did the vocal arrangements on her version. If she wanted to be credited as a writer...she could've been. Bit she obviously didn't care.

Stop looking for a moment. You look exhausted

A moment from what?

From boredom obviously.

[Scott.]

n

You're living a bit huh 

plea

[Sovereign.]

I love this. She really makes good ass R&B music. 

[Sovereign.]

Is Tamar the new Queen of R&B? 

[GLOCK]

Saeed boy