Britney Spears Sells Music Catalog, Other Rights to Primary Wave

Started by Lazarus, February 10, 2026, 03:51:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

RAY7

Quote from: Russian Fury on Today at 03:58:36 PMyeah I'd say packaging that Britney brought was important

not just cuz she was cute or pretty

but her voice, how she glided on songs....the whole "concept" of Britney

yeah there were people there piecing everything together but the same can be said for most artists - especially back then when "artist development" was huge.

they brought the talent/looks and were "molded" into "stars".
I'd even say her voice made her stand out for sure
But Xtina, Jessica and Mandy were actually trying to SANG and not do that "baby" voice thing
Then came Kelly Clarkson, Pink etc
Who was trying to do that baby voice?

Kalifornia.


FUCK Bey

Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 04:17:10 PM
Quote from: FUCK Bey on Today at 03:53:02 PM
Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 03:19:15 PM
Quote from: Russian Fury on Today at 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 03:09:25 PMeven the 99-00s bubblegum pop
We had Spice Girls, BSB, N'Sync before the solo white girl Britney hopped on the wave, with a song that TLC turned down. She was never a creative artist she just was able to drop her music first before Xtina and Jessica
i was wondering if BSB n em came before Brit but was too lazy to verify

snsjnjnscjnscjnscjncsjnjcj

Britney still def did a great job of really introducing a very specific packaging of bubblegum pop

she clearly had her own lane and it was SUPER evident when people tried to come after her to copy it

no one can really say there was a britney before britney.


it was really the visual more than the music. Blonde teenage white girl who can dance and sing
The labels definitely rushed to throw out any Becky they could find after Britney blew up.
But if we're talking specifically about the music
Max Martin had already started making those pop songs before her
Acting like visuals don't count in millennial pop is wild. :dead: Saying "it was just the visuals" in a pop debate is damn near like saying film is "just the cinematography." What is "Single Ladies" without the choreography?  What the hell is goddam Formation without the visuals? Or nearly any damn Beyonce hit.


n
This isn't a pop debate. Britney sold her MUSIC catalog and we're discussing how "timeless" and trailblazing she was for her MUSIC to go for $200 Million
Also, I didn't say "visuals don't matter" they just matter more to Britney's success than her music did
Fuck you.


RAY7

Quote from: FUCK Bey on Today at 04:31:24 PM
Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 04:17:10 PM
Quote from: FUCK Bey on Today at 03:53:02 PM
Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 03:19:15 PM
Quote from: Russian Fury on Today at 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 03:09:25 PMeven the 99-00s bubblegum pop
We had Spice Girls, BSB, N'Sync before the solo white girl Britney hopped on the wave, with a song that TLC turned down. She was never a creative artist she just was able to drop her music first before Xtina and Jessica
i was wondering if BSB n em came before Brit but was too lazy to verify

snsjnjnscjnscjnscjncsjnjcj

Britney still def did a great job of really introducing a very specific packaging of bubblegum pop

she clearly had her own lane and it was SUPER evident when people tried to come after her to copy it

no one can really say there was a britney before britney.


it was really the visual more than the music. Blonde teenage white girl who can dance and sing
The labels definitely rushed to throw out any Becky they could find after Britney blew up.
But if we're talking specifically about the music
Max Martin had already started making those pop songs before her
Acting like visuals don't count in millennial pop is wild. :dead: Saying "it was just the visuals" in a pop debate is damn near like saying film is "just the cinematography." What is "Single Ladies" without the choreography?  What the hell is goddam Formation without the visuals? Or nearly any damn Beyonce hit.


n
This isn't a pop debate. Britney sold her MUSIC catalog and we're discussing how "timeless" and trailblazing she was for her MUSIC to go for $200 Million
Also, I didn't say "visuals don't matter" they just matter more to Britney's success than her music did
Fuck you.
dd DD gf
Take Bey's name out of your Username nigger
 :unbothered:

Russian Fury

Quote from: RAY7 on Today at 04:23:21 PM
Quote from: Russian Fury on Today at 03:58:36 PMyeah I'd say packaging that Britney brought was important

not just cuz she was cute or pretty

but her voice, how she glided on songs....the whole "concept" of Britney

yeah there were people there piecing everything together but the same can be said for most artists - especially back then when "artist development" was huge.

they brought the talent/looks and were "molded" into "stars".
I'd even say her voice made her stand out for sure
But Xtina, Jessica and Mandy were actually trying to SANG and not do that "baby" voice thing
Then came Kelly Clarkson, Pink etc
Who was trying to do that baby voice?
jessica def tried it

snjsjnjncjsncjnscjsjsjjncncsjjcjcsjcscjscj


Grandpa and his grandma

Russian Fury

Quote from: Kalifornia. on Today at 04:28:26 PMNot Kenny G :dead:  :dead:  :dead:
scjnsjncjsncjnsjncsjncjnscjncsjncsjcsjcsjscjsc

bitch dont sleep

"the moment" alber >>>>


Grandpa and his grandma

Russian Fury

those babyish coos/moans on the verses were Brit DOWNE

sdjnsdndjsnjnsdjnsdjsj



Grandpa and his grandma


klappa.

songwriting quee