Home

[Herb.]

The sense in someone saying a message isnt there, and in the same breath downplaying that same nonexistent message lies in what 'disingenuous' refers to.

Still making very little sense. If there is no message, how is it received? That's like the basics of communication. A message, the channel and the recipient. You cannot accept what is not there. View the videos I posted above.

The reception of this 'message' is not what's in question.

Oh, we all know what was received through this song.

Fuck me good and take me to Red Lobster.

No one questioned that.

The intent behind the attempt at being a political channel, is what I mentioned.

Well it became the topic of many political discussions.

Rudy Guliani wasn't talking about Red Lobster. Nor were many newspeople. Or the Black Panther founders. Maybe that's all you see. And that's fine.

[AIDS!]

Its not like the video was cheap to make or anything that went into it.

she perched in a gymnasium, danced in a hallway, sat on a car and danced in a parking lot
Woo!

[RekeRig]

For starters:

"She knew what she was doing" is the same thing they're saying about her being an opportunist.

I can comfortably say that Malcolm X knew what he was doing as well. Am I calling him an opportunist? Does clear intent automatically equate to that? According to you, it appears that it does. But then again, I never SPECIFIED what I meant when I stated that "she knew she was doing". You interpreted it in a way that supports YOUR argument.

Still reading.

What did you mean?

Whenever I see you say "she knew what she was doing" it seemed to me like you meant she knew how to cause controversy. To cause all this convasashun.

When Kandi and Todd talk about divorce before a season on RHOA, it's promo for the upcoming season.

So to "tackle" a social issue and use the biggest platform on TV to do it at the start of a new era spells marketing/opportunist to most, not organic, genuine, or out of necessity/passion.

1. wtf

2. That was kinda the point. Put it on the biggest platform for all to see. 

3. Its a new song for the new era. But an opportunistic individual would've tried to milk it for everything that it could get from it in this day & age.

Like... money from VEVO views (not on there), Streaming services money, and on itunes. 

no one makes much money from vevo views and streams lol that's nothing

It's ok for her to be an opportunist. It's a business if you think she wasn't being just that, then ur wrong IMO. She's benefited from the timing and platform of it all, period. As she should

[L0NZ.]

Im sorr' i've just never heard of a opportunistic Artist that would prefer Woo they talking about me on the news  (the common person would probably love this or a Z-List Celeb)

Well, she prides herself on being "that bitch cuz she cause all this conversation." Beyonce ain't worried about no money, we all know that   

[RekeRig]

the fascniation with this SONG, puzzles me.

Then just say that, instead of trying to downplay its impact. Or ignoring the fact that others received the message. Others, as in, people who are not stans of Beyonce. lol

if anything, Fox News misinterpreted the lyrics and created their own mess for their own agenda

Doesn't really equate to Beyonc? having some profound message at all

[BAPHOMET.]

Is it Cocoa?

I didnt quote you the other, n the other time. and im not going to this time.

SCOOT. I dont use.

[AIDS!]

I don't need you to

[BAPHOMET.]

For starters:

"She knew what she was doing" is the same thing they're saying about her being an opportunist.

I can comfortably say that Malcolm X knew what he was doing as well. Am I calling him an opportunist? Does clear intent automatically equate to that? According to you, it appears that it does. But then again, I never SPECIFIED what I meant when I stated that "she knew she was doing". You interpreted it in a way that supports YOUR argument.

Still reading.

What did you mean?

Whenever I see you say "she knew what she was doing" it seemed to me like you meant she knew how to cause controversy. To cause all this convasashun.

When Kandi and Todd talk about divorce before a season on RHOA, it's promo for the upcoming season.

So to "tackle" a social issue and use the biggest platform on TV to do it at the start of a new era spells marketing/opportunist to most, not organic, genuine, or out of necessity/passion.

1. wtf

2. That was kinda the point. Put it on the biggest platform for all to see. 

3. Its a new song for the new era. But an opportunistic individual would've tried to milk it for everything that it could get from it in this day & age.

Like... money from VEVO views (not on there), Streaming services money, and on itunes. 

no one makes much money from vevo views and streams lol that's nothing

It's ok for her to be an opportunist. It's a business if you think she wasn't being just that, then ur wrong IMO. She's benefited from the timing and platform of it all, period. As she should

What did she benefit from possibly tarnishing herself? 

[BAPHOMET.]

d

then dont quote me again.. ever. Simple.

[RekeRig]

Is it Cocoa?

I didnt quote you the other, n the other time. and im not going to this time.

SCOOT. I dont use.

be nice bby

[AIDS!]

d

then dont quote me again.. ever. Simple.

make me 

[Vonc2002]

the fascniation with this SONG, puzzles me.

Then just say that, instead of trying to downplay its impact. Or ignoring the fact that others received the message. Others, as in, people who are not stans of Beyonce. lol

if anything, Fox News misinterpreted the lyrics and created their own mess for their own agenda

Doesn't really equate to Beyonc? having some profound message at all

Im fckn KICKING

[RekeRig]

For starters:

"She knew what she was doing" is the same thing they're saying about her being an opportunist.

I can comfortably say that Malcolm X knew what he was doing as well. Am I calling him an opportunist? Does clear intent automatically equate to that? According to you, it appears that it does. But then again, I never SPECIFIED what I meant when I stated that "she knew she was doing". You interpreted it in a way that supports YOUR argument.

Still reading.

What did you mean?

Whenever I see you say "she knew what she was doing" it seemed to me like you meant she knew how to cause controversy. To cause all this convasashun.

When Kandi and Todd talk about divorce before a season on RHOA, it's promo for the upcoming season.

So to "tackle" a social issue and use the biggest platform on TV to do it at the start of a new era spells marketing/opportunist to most, not organic, genuine, or out of necessity/passion.

1. wtf

2. That was kinda the point. Put it on the biggest platform for all to see. 

3. Its a new song for the new era. But an opportunistic individual would've tried to milk it for everything that it could get from it in this day & age.

Like... money from VEVO views (not on there), Streaming services money, and on itunes. 

no one makes much money from vevo views and streams lol that's nothing

It's ok for her to be an opportunist. It's a business if you think she wasn't being just that, then ur wrong IMO. She's benefited from the timing and platform of it all, period. As she should

What did she benefit from possibly tarnishing herself? 

Queen Beys can never be Tarn'

She knows that

[GLOCK]

Formation did not snatch me like it did the rest of you girls, I just can't go up for it at all. I hope she has a few more songs in this "movie" and I hope she goes back to Saaanging because everything she been serving since the Beyonc? era has lacked  the Beyonc? I grew to love the Beyonc? that saang down #ImJustSayin

yeah lol

[AIDS!]

The song isn't that black power anthem y'all are making it OUT to be